Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-young-entity-category-07
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 23 April 2018 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5806F12D7F1; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, draft-young-entity-category@ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-young-entity-category-07
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.79.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <152450364133.21838.7173985142788262386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:14:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/wEDfQthjv4Bzw0xI1NsVRsrJy6c>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:14:01 -0000
The IESG has completed a review of draft-young-entity-category-07 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'The Entity Category SAML Attribute Types' <draft-young-entity-category-07.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-young-entity-category/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-young-entity-category/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary