Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailsploit

Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com> Tue, 05 December 2017 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51F31277BB for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:43:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=wordtothewise.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BBGsGngkSNJ for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B28124319 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB5McJFi021904; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:38:20 -0800
Authentication-Results: simon.songbird.com; dkim=fail reason="verification failed; unprotected key" header.d=wordtothewise.com header.i=@wordtothewise.com header.b=sj7cm6c6; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from mail.wordtothewise.com (mail.wordtothewise.com [184.105.179.154]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB5McH04021892 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:38:18 -0800
Received: from satsuke.wordtothewise.com (204.11.227.194.static.etheric.net [204.11.227.194]) by mail.wordtothewise.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E316723379 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:38:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wordtothewise.com; s=aardvark; t=1512513513; bh=U5xbiX3vfxkD/tgwjbeDkDxTY0Cl+pddOWXO3NZa4KQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=sj7cm6c66jgJa6Agr0gXoN0UMw+LTNDSzvT8zxn4FNgUx6AMymZlt2csScisCtypq uey/0lp/Gau9SvNh6WjoWkcWkGaOUc3K/cU+anp0K8wb1iN2MqJgdBAKnEx+cmSgPC Rp+JgyhiNOIOP18T/cj0Nl+/7wC0xlAG5r7nLpEs=
From: Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:37:54 -0800
References: <CAHNGrjEzrmdbjhxf_W2qkX8eiSoSaoYoiMDma3yuM2brS6KVmw@mail.gmail.com> <75c9b339-b60f-0b06-e613-ef40a131e280@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
In-Reply-To: <75c9b339-b60f-0b06-e613-ef40a131e280@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
Message-Id: <7816A497-BCDF-4BCE-85E6-106CBE54F51D@wordtothewise.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by simon.songbird.com id vB5McH04021892
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailsploit
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: ietf-dkim <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
> 
> What's worse, no security, or bad / false security?

That's DMARC's motto.

Cheers,
  Steve


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html