Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-Signature: r=y and MLM

Brandon Long <blong@google.com> Sun, 19 August 2018 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <blong@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EF4130EDA for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPbdfE0gFnmw for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22a.google.com (mail-yb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81637130EA4 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f4-v6so3923640ybp.7 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5yKJEy/mQsIdf79ZOitFzrSrK/wk6N3tHBJkpI/yCmo=; b=f+rVvA2iucA/QnEXv9oyeRY/OIXA2m69JChytvJ/y46TLaOh2vhFHdFoh3Mk2W6yZo 6Vj1BR+phs8fiQ96+PhGO7qUSfpxRBtaWsW+g1TEmxCO8Hsonct5GOo2ZyPqB5xmF55B gkGuvAnobUCkNG5jfea59Q9lnUfY4Q6FBvyQ8dPyeostn39CexMPTlv8AoanuU2GJ+0f oit9wox9CVLVKYSBVhS2ToL0wTsT1cHN4MdqYrI/h35GmQG+1V+0pKGKCwE7BInZmM3N HmnwkKvq6iRz77NjrMSxEu0NyGRAxzpM8reyDn+UroMlJYBrB9CWVnOzOx2prBOrNSPl DIPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5yKJEy/mQsIdf79ZOitFzrSrK/wk6N3tHBJkpI/yCmo=; b=V4YjwygwZWMNvASNIvJdT5Hm5Quw1DgSL+U8dDpr7QnCdV+kBK9Bftxf8fIWGaMmix 2Q+ldMDBCQIyAYQjX+B12vkQGINx8ZJgYoWkdKWeLg8E3mLss39D5DgZe6ov2XTJhwFx DM+Q6Fx8b4KIQxKMmLWe73Q3u2K/SP4qkpChYp2Ke4n82kC7Rp+uTE/wQWBJKn7DLkny jlgz/ebF0h4SS4a6R0Kx8GzZnqEVpDXdPWDQkHsYKJDdUkFyoM4YSAjWfb+y0OwgOiLG XDsSe3Dfg2qrPPF5Pc5R5gUhU3GWS+gFcKBEmEOVKKDrXmM5dLlUamstDm0rixCNFuiT 5NDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlE5dZVEaGXHQ+MAbZ4LoaR+CiOkqDPa0zzxD2RFUytR+e0PSChU AIAlLv+vJxAa7j42tL5I2E5mnF/KUuoGw9ZLnbfS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwu3LccTSwVvoM6b50Nbck7qViKXXZOC9GmFzt2RSdZ/FWRCm6GC0vtfnZsclP82qFYXSpNbS6w2MVhaA9nvCg=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c691:: with SMTP id k139-v6mr23713105ybf.424.1534718799242; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180811033840.Horde.i6llD-AtvgzyNIjbhTs-nkS@webmail.aegee.org> <CAL0qLwb=rBRit5XeUQA+73SjfyFx45KrpERgrrFSdbs6HjuNcw@mail.gmail.com> <20180819033040.Horde.JkYXlO3cdf73djeAQuexlVf@webmail.aegee.org> <CAL0qLwY6OmyHAvfv3GL-L6cwemQDtB4juoGdfJ6XEo_-n06NdQ@mail.gmail.com> <31338A71-F151-48FD-A44A-DB28F0AA97D1@aegee.org> <CAL0qLwYgcHGAwHar858-0BfKtVQ=FN1SVDC6iNRjQ58LE=LVrg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYgcHGAwHar858-0BfKtVQ=FN1SVDC6iNRjQ58LE=LVrg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 14:09:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CABa8R6u+KGa=A0zB7gpModbFAbdsrGwBSig3Cd86FZjQRh8r1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?= <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, ietf-dkim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc76930573d1909d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/GSJLrwDIrnxoUkjxrLQ9hMYwaQA>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-Signature: r=y and MLM
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:46:42 -0000

Dkim signatures are often removed by mailing lists.  For one, there are
receivers who reject messages with broken dkim signatures despite the rfc
saying don't do that.

And that shouldn't affect arc, mailing lists make plenty of other breaking
changes to the message, that's why arc is useful.  I'm not online to see
the argument that mailman is making there.

I don't think anyone's going to start modifying the dkim signature header
of do this, plus it seems odd, you're asking for where it's broken, and
this is where it's broken.

Brandon

On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 1:53 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Dilyan Palauzov <
> Dilyan.Palauzov@aegee.org>; wrote:
>
>> I suggested to write in ARC to alter the existing signature.
>>
>
> As I said before, I suspect you will have a hard time selling an "alter
> the existing signature" idea no matter what document you propose to create
> or update.
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-dkim mailing list
> Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
>