Re: [ietf-dkim] versions of RFC822 mail messages, Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signature?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 12 February 2018 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0E51205F0 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:42:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LT42Wzqsyuvu for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EFD51200E5 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w1C2fZ3g001017; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:41:35 -0800
Authentication-Results: simon.songbird.com; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=fail (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from takifugu.mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w1C2fX8U001003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:41:34 -0800
Received: from takifugu.mtcc.com (takifugu.mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by takifugu.mtcc.com (8.15.2/8.14.7) with ESMTPSA id w1C2eWt6010957 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:40:32 -0800
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
References: <20180210155011.3735B1A7DD64@ary.qy> <47dd136e-e122-9bd2-8cf1-7a712770d930@bbiw.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1802101244340.58081@ary.qy> <151740cf-796e-16eb-2ef5-ca296b5d4af0@bbiw.net> <84d515c0-7c76-232d-464f-3215db00d14d@mtcc.com> <e561d00e-d313-e700-77ff-6ead65a37bc9@bbiw.net> <3912f0ba-0b17-24f5-75ec-38f7465a45b6@mtcc.com> <ff024002-0f7b-8987-fad2-408adb31d8e4@bbiw.net> <e7612811-e876-ea21-f072-46d200e89159@mtcc.com> <79c2d80c-5c35-33a2-6f50-338a0cbba58b@bbiw.net>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <1531bf45-dcbb-85d2-83f6-773553300ab4@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:40:32 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <79c2d80c-5c35-33a2-6f50-338a0cbba58b@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] versions of RFC822 mail messages, Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signature?
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: "ietf-dkim" <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>

On 02/11/2018 06:20 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 2/11/2018 5:54 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Please review the participation rules applicable to this list. They 
> are the same as you had so much trouble with, previously.
>
> Then please consider unsubscribing, since restraint within the bounds 
> of professional behavior appears to (continue to) be absent from your 
> repertoire.
>
> d/
>

Sorry, you don't know what you are talking about. I wrote code every day 
for a living. I wrote the first implementation of DKIM, followed
very quickly by Murray's. I know what I'm talking about here. You 
don't.  When is the last time you've written code? This is all very silly
to me, and your impugning my 30+ years of experience is a joke.

Mike

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html