Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (5137)
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Wed, 04 October 2017 01:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B6313232C for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=bbiw.net header.b=q42EPWY2; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=bbiw.net header.b=K4ijooCS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WdzDXwUBRsZ5 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB140132153 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v941peO3027636; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:51:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1507081911; bh=TDahCso/vjJMclGi9w9Hd2GKOWNf9LIzLpKaEz0ckFU=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=q42EPWY26YzHIo6y8GpT8+6bHmr3GZqjrAGW3ocCdj1UKXnIkzAthSLE0USMW+sJ4 aOCSPhAljWZ4jIo4+jFQBmyyNCsXTt7PLeeZjQ55gDH9QYO1i+tQ/7ZXMxxL4XCZ5y uWLoVHWssbciJyksaaKnydYN8vTIC/KhqzkkHUEE=
Received: from [10.10.10.2] (CPE64777d999e03-CM64777d999e00.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.230.30.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v941pba5027630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:51:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1507081899; bh=jSgw6cEHovyJRQc6Vtal/6ggQkfLr5YepDvnSV0mjPY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=K4ijooCSlfwPBLQ08/fYNUeuODVpm5BBNaxwsohIcsMeOE1BQFzErKnePMXvgcu6b ELfmrpAIh8wHR2pNTPqbue1XwgPu71e6u99MvgQmgIu0jtWERDNDQB2ca2+JkziaTb zKG02HZQGENeFWfBVvoX9yXdmBdPAFTNIY1OpzIk=
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, tony+dkimov@maillennium.att.com, msk@cloudmark.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, barryleiba@computer.org
References: <20171003232446.F0F6EB80E1C@rfc-editor.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <359b0006-1002-48b3-af79-456d409acfd2@bbiw.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:50:30 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171003232446.F0F6EB80E1C@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Cc: pesmith@microsoft.com, ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (5137)
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: ietf-dkim <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
On 10/3/2017 7:24 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > Type: Technical > Reported by: Peter Smith<pesmith@microsoft.com> > > Section: 3.6.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > key-k-tag = %x76 [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-k-tag-type > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > key-k-tag = %x6b [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-k-tag-type > > > Notes > ----- > The key-k-tag should (presumably) start with the letter "k" to match the other key-LETTER-tag definitions and to match the "k=" heading. However, the ABNF specifies %76 which is the letter "v", not the letter "k". The correct value is %x6b. oops. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC63… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC63… Dave Crocker