Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24573182F5E9
	for <ietf-dkim@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2025 17:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
	DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
	ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
	USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5]
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=google.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31])
	by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id zd2DgYVFVfNh for <ietf-dkim@mail2.ietf.org>;
	Sun,  6 Apr 2025 17:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C54D4182F5D9
	for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2025 17:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id
 e9e14a558f8ab-3d6d1489cfbso15ab.0
        for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1743984682; x=1744589482; darn=ietf.org;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=ZC0+7gR7yHbL8i5VEfhA4J29zRy4/rHQeFshmF4e20Y=;
        b=cxUj4CCSYVsAB8HIndV/03FXCr+L9Glznpn2IVCSBOtF88BcEFFlKe36tnIm1pcAty
         sffN6g6hsqneU2NKe+EbC4IprYddmC+lzEueZVDKPgEOV3siboYLyk5cqxxVIK0rz6V7
         v2m0DCCEja7RXoCuyIZ2mLVhobNRN/aG9gXABXWSfMQl+573H9He3vRVA+KavQ8CWuZh
         9l8yf5UHLshx0FRr+CDc2LtwgyspXzPNyjYv8wWQE+Y+a6G/g9+vn3+vfb/iXKXvsllq
         wtBqkPvgowCcK/kL9aX8IpDd0wpJns2OX8UbPp35IqQg07z51UTHzj0hmZJQPf2gcCBQ
         1Bmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743984682; x=1744589482;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=ZC0+7gR7yHbL8i5VEfhA4J29zRy4/rHQeFshmF4e20Y=;
        b=WdIjn1Ic4fGWxOegX5SEYgm8WbujVyn4d07vldZ4o8amGsBmqtSnhbQ5bXkpBoBGRF
         LKe1croqAWsGCKhBsKrQ0vFTN68l+fYpTXD+NzDJJoEK431FIBdVhJjcnBv2MBFqXpod
         yeBSgRa6GmJcZk44Ox96aSka0dX9m6MKmKeVEA4WIdsKwPl2B5M7V4lZ1uiMT76Zf1Pq
         Gz+q+xPl1xJqmXv7Vmn0If4noLz+VTYbPeHQEQMMC/mK8PXxeAEA3wuhCTBGI/MWVpTq
         pHT2XAdXOuLywzTbQyewBgzT3fXaQuoCyo8Ba1F8seNthytXucVfL7Buctzz+kv/eBs6
         XDIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEKGxIk6gQ2BB+yuSodppZ1udo9TCNqLeq6Sz+BfFMXUMNzBg+
	Po6hbo+Y8sFptt0XqdkYFdGKEJfiZkY2PzEWtMs9ooGygoUWnSsoUDRl+wHQ+EyBtZZrIRI42X3
	rY4mZwbXruHhafADtij9lSMLZqNcNbP2NxTcpSC5coNh8ScTe5w==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct8R50mxM97KLXkvMA8jMTeHuEfEBYsASnFN9uHzyb5qDD055aUL7ZAvoP+s1z
	cZ+iinvZuPnLRmsNh+dua2yw17I1XMIorWP9O6y5KLXHvv/6Y7Jv0Xhr/gLtyBtzf8FAHVzAIZ1
	boFyiYyI+FmQNLE7oeMXHdiU0ksUo4GQcty6op1cQKbKHYX5AJdTjmkw6SXwg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: 
 AGHT+IHKAoPULpCK2yuW+08aoPwAwdKvZWXZtYSoCvC9nIad3/w2XSBG+g0yxpEE5ibqJvaEb/z8iVgZNMyIRYoJm94=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:f14:b0:3ce:37f4:1825 with SMTP id
 e9e14a558f8ab-3d6fd606ad5mr885ab.0.1743984680133; Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:11:20
 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAAFsWK1=00ao-OdeABL_=Awo3JeiJmth_PPS=UhK_u+Zb9_6ig@mail.gmail.com>
 <f21fab35-685a-4fc6-bf01-e4dd187565e1@app.fastmail.com>
 <CAAFsWK0fnoHL9kC8K_n9zuhvr-DeiO_udBEnEUz40w6EMtDqcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <920b3384-21c3-440b-b859-a1a1df00cb75@app.fastmail.com>
 <4cdbadc0-0a58-47a2-ba39-e7df76be343e@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <4cdbadc0-0a58-47a2-ba39-e7df76be343e@tana.it>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 17:11:07 -0700
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUEyORiotTANgaHjFGJ1OTT78_qbaTKjzvF-fn2kI_vGn3e7RfCCvlCttMM
Message-ID: 
 <CAAFsWK3RsL0Lw9_SYJ0iFmx68-t-hqOQMYD45+iwcrkrkCmazg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005b05b20632251377"
Message-ID-Hash: J3GLH3ZXIVMTISVVTT3GQIR3VMLLMQQS
X-Message-ID-Hash: J3GLH3ZXIVMTISVVTT3GQIR3VMLLMQQS
X-MailFrom: weihaw@google.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-dkim.ietf.org-0;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BIetf-dkim=5D_Re=3A_Review_of_draft-gondwana-dkim2-modification-?=
	=?utf-8?q?alegbra-01?=
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/eHL6OjI_j94xmaqafzKQzs23s9g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-dkim-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-dkim-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-dkim-leave@ietf.org>

--0000000000005b05b20632251377
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 10:58=E2=80=AFAM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> =
wrote:

>
> IMHO, the original Bron's idea of a single DKIM2-Delta-Header: per
> signature is more practical.  Otherwise, it'd be nicer to have:
>
> DKIM2-Original-From: i=3D3; YnJvbmdAZmFzdG1haWx0ZWFtLmNvbQo=3D"
> From: dkim@lists.ietf.org
> DKIM2-Original-Reply-To: i=3D3;
> Reply-To: dkim@lists.ietf.org
> DKIM2-Original-Subject: i=3D3; A replacement for DKIM
> Subject: [DKIM2] A replacement for DKIM
>
> Empty fields are equivalent to non-existing.
>

FWIW if we go with per header mutations, I find this style of inlining the
original header name as a suffix is more readable.

-Wei

--0000000000005b05b20632251377
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote g=
mail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Apr 5, =
2025 at 10:58=E2=80=AFAM Alessandro Vesely &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:vesely@tan=
a.it">vesely@tana.it</a>&gt; wrote:</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);pa=
dding-left:1ex">
<br>
IMHO, the original Bron&#39;s idea of a single DKIM2-Delta-Header: per sign=
ature is more practical.=C2=A0 Otherwise, it&#39;d be nicer to have:<br>
<br>
DKIM2-Original-From: i=3D3; YnJvbmdAZmFzdG1haWx0ZWFtLmNvbQo=3D&quot;<br>
From: <a href=3D"mailto:dkim@lists.ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">dkim@lists.i=
etf.org</a><br>
DKIM2-Original-Reply-To: i=3D3;<br>
Reply-To: <a href=3D"mailto:dkim@lists.ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">dkim@lis=
ts.ietf.org</a><br>
DKIM2-Original-Subject: i=3D3; A replacement for DKIM<br>
Subject: [DKIM2] A replacement for DKIM<br>
<br>
Empty fields are equivalent to non-existing.<br></blockquote><div><br></div=
><div>FWIW if we go with per header mutations, I find this style of inlinin=
g the original header name as a suffix is more readable.=C2=A0=C2=A0</div><=
div>=C2=A0</div><div>-Wei</div></div></div>

--0000000000005b05b20632251377--

