[ietf-dkim] Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signature?

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 08 February 2018 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B012E1250B8 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 02:16:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5IC8cPRBJZz for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 02:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64517127909 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 02:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w18AF9Mw009599; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 02:15:11 -0800
Authentication-Results: simon.songbird.com; dkim=fail reason="verification failed; unprotected key" header.d=tana.it header.i=@tana.it header.b=Upwi118D; dkim-adsp=unknown (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from wmail.tana.it (nobody@wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w18AF4Xh009572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 02:15:06 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1518084844; bh=LCSYFBpcz36CVdVQ0x5cspwj06Hiuncw5mljcFf7Re8=; l=206; h=To:From:Date; b=Upwi118DBjZgFrbVCUjlWaUW8R6pCV17xOaaAu28qHCxA1/1qGU9REjEyXCg6vTcC Px88p8+oTpj9GNi0K0xEwvApqyH1hUy7/deOlMLOdCKFtG+xU3qu7L5MOgZ8fjtiC/ h8ieZno9zlHwSJmal7bbGsxr1r3Too79scngmbWQ=
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [172.25.197.109] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.109]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPA; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 11:14:04 +0100 id 00000000005DC0C8.000000005A7C22EC.00006D69
To: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Openpgp: id=0A5B4BB141A53F7F55FC8CBCB6ACF44490D17C00
Message-ID: <9e7d6a29-cbef-e032-4af9-eb5395071b4d@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:14:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signature?
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: "ietf-dkim" <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>

Hi,

someone asked me about case sensitiveness of the header field name.  I looked
for an ABNF in RFC6376, but only found examples and informative notes.

Is that an error worth being reported?

Ale
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html