Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 10 February 2018 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634C9126D45 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:15:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gt_zb6XjPBWP for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7642E124BFA for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w1A7EGNB004580; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:14:17 -0800
Authentication-Results: simon.songbird.com; dkim=fail reason="verification failed; unprotected key" header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=evxGvBG4; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w1A7EBbR004550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:14:13 -0800
Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x196so14104069lfd.12 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IymVjZGci3ItOyUXldgnHOb+rUPCdo9hHWmhm5YA/A4=; b=evxGvBG4UsuRHxFj9QJK1XR9a723LXx3I+EpF6AVW/bCjKkKJzoZlLE4ZlAItl4h7v 8Yhkl9J8ED93YTp+AVFgRZdtTIXcEWFachoxsMnMSJkfZB6RquN3ElkVmn9fuL9GFPvs o+TPhaehp/3bIQCmG2QtWFsIlE2CGyYDc05xelvCF/Kw7/KDXc+mGGPLLYDQ4QN6TRr0 QUWG0+SBpRXF6H8odajA9StPEXC3OBkAcJuUp48pEAJIEUOAk0QxjPi87DPNx+PMNxpb Cy7q2lvplMlV+oDd+IUzCiTVuG8ON/rqf14Ck5pbQcdsJaqQ/ikovpoFjh7MKk3EtnbY aSxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IymVjZGci3ItOyUXldgnHOb+rUPCdo9hHWmhm5YA/A4=; b=mbWe1LOx9Ii42PBT/gmPhZbOERGlVs/5EFgMxWTpuNcmdBdPFraZsQyeeLYxDiaQhT HA3wRrUDA9bKTxsTV2ZArjxzFGCw+agKwBq/2+6eb/3+KncBi9Z/itbVfMb5UjZrZ0aP gkpjwPtAKNwleRQPcY43n5Gm5r9ecxZrt3VpLI6jQezHprUXr9sr5j8x/Tgyg18mqkeN VJe6DPmDlE2orSgdG/YLWzA0mU2WjbOzcswocmvVY+0zGw0k63yuKREHZ2+KJ9kw0Xp1 x9sI0VVIxSwdfMHJFkVTzKgCwx7D+OmqDHI0IvAQ7Hnw+taXqL94m7Zw/l9DHAvZ7nSG tzSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDLFWvDvnw9UOWGlmD+sC6q1x0iG+KsDlRPEGoQNJYEtLJighYW yHYcpHISahj0xwqzj8o1Ewdyo2TUH7ovUafqb6Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225BGAc0MfmRByNeOF1A5zA/YpPHUx/b8NlTUTWKu/9llKDhOx434BG5b3mDKigDCPKM1ABP2dq9R3HbHKqpETI=
X-Received: by 10.25.79.8 with SMTP id d8mr3121320lfb.59.1518246785437; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 23:13:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.66.79 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:13:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180209232219.6D9F11A7B7E9@ary.qy>
References: <1707398.kN3rUcK64s@kitterma-e6430> <20180209232219.6D9F11A7B7E9@ary.qy>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:13:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZyvm3TeZuWgqRyF4+1bEw+opWfnbkWCcTyQA=zmX-DFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com>, DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9129942237939529364=="
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: "ietf-dkim" <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <1707398.kN3rUcK64s@kitterma-e6430> you write:
> >Does this need to update RFC 7208 since there are SPF related MUST
> >requirements?
>
> I would think so, also 6376, 7489, 7601 since it updates DKIM, DMARC, and
> A-R specs.
>

Since 7601bis is now a live DMARC WG document, you might want to make some
suggestions over there since 7601 will be obsoleted.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html