Re: [Ietf-dkim] Adding an aim= tag to DKIM Signature Tag Specifications

[Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>]

On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 5:31:30 AM EDT Steve Atkins wrote:
> On 12/05/2020 09:20, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > On Tue 12/May/2020 00:08:15 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote:
> >> On 5/11/2020 1:33 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> >>> There might also be the situation where a domain wants to delegate a key
> >> 
> >> Hence my suggestion that figuring out such details is where discussion
> >> could get interesting, if only because people will raise all sorts of
> >> combinatorial theories, independent of demonstrated need, and this is a
> >> space with lots of combinatorials...
> > 
> > Besides delegated keys, some other obvious classes I'd propose —without
> > venturing to forge English keywords— are as follows:
> > 
> > * 1st class personal messages (with or without From: restrictions),
> > 
> > * mailing lists (with or without From: rewrite),
> > 
> > * bulk messages (including transactional confirmations, complaints, ...),
> > 
> > * forwarded mail (after severe/loose antispam filtering).
> > 
> > Perhaps, the keywords should be dash-separated jumbles of terms chosen
> > from a predefined grab bag, to allow for combinations.
> 
> Some prior work in this space is TEOS.
> 
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301324998_Trusted_Email_Open_Standa
> rd_A_Comprehensive_Policy_and_Technology_Proposal_for_Email_Reform

I looked through it.  It is so 2003 FUSSP.

Scott K