Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI

Hector Santos <> Wed, 06 December 2017 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114CE1275FD for <>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:47:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.99
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=LRKa0EI+; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=JHiXZPh7
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Y8rCq9wznY8 for <>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CAAE1272E1 for <>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB6Hfjuc025612; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:41:47 -0800
Authentication-Results:; dkim=fail reason="verification failed; unprotected key" header.b=LRKa0EI+; dkim-adsp=fail (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB6HffuK025585 for <>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:41:43 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1;; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=903; t=1512582073; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=WoyBrgwZxBjp+PZ/aEokIl44YBY=; b=LRKa0EI+l1aMKQNsAInS sYLlCPrAivzuAEwaNVy/uQ2mcVVQ5YEl8/xb7xmA6ItShVEmIng1WNC20sa5wLGI fRd7+J8Ij2RVV7ROD5Fa7bovGVC5EJOioiM0ah6yocTxrowQb2fqgEzHOoaUJ5sM 1MloDY6VhNjyJvp77I3R0jg=
Received: by (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.6) for; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:41:13 -0500
Authentication-Results:; dkim=pass header.s=tms1; adsp=pass policy=all;
Received: from ([]) by (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.6) with ESMTP id 2450790856.1.304; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:41:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1;; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=903; t=1512581894; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=nEoc2NS SANFOpHFzJpDNtUKA+BxxG2E1QMtMSAFQDp4=; b=JHiXZPh7PujcBmW/VRtZHQX lXZaaMI0mN9PCZ8Vq6M47CpgJmagkvUviQ7pdyydy0aPHle1UiP9MKIYk6tc9XRh iOJzGCaYwyQitlpMNto/seH68cxOJpRwuL1AYDif2bS9zdR2TOsDh0+Tl4nDUM7S xsV0hQCYG1dm+AEaI4zo=
Received: by (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.6) for; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:38:14 -0500
Received: from [] ([]) by (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.6) with ESMTP id 2450734860.9.388848; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:38:13 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:41:11 -0500
From: Hector Santos <>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1712052213140.62996@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1712052213140.62996@ary.qy>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Sender: "ietf-dkim" <>


I think there are parsing issues to be highlighted.  Do you decode 
first, then extract the Author Domain or extract first before 
decoding? etc.

On 12/5/2017 10:27 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> If I may change the topic for a moment ...
> I'm working on some stuff for ICANN to help people get EAI mail
> working. One of the underspecified bits of EAI is how authentication
> works with SPF, DKIM, DMARC and now, I suppose ARC.  There's a bunch
> of places where one needs to make arbitrary decisions about what's in
> ASCII (a-labels) or what's in UTF-8 (u-labels.)  I did a draft about
> it last year:
> It would be nice if this could be finished and published, so I have
> something better than an expired draft to point at when people ask me
> how to do DKIM and SPF with their EAI mail.


NOTE WELL: This list operates according to