IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-hub-bangalore] IP hop by hop routing with TE

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 May 2016 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64C812D1CB for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NzTwR1t1q-YP for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C721312D545 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d62so115089305iof.2 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2016 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=oV28/3CWs1lY4ivwJEiAJm4jYietAK3xdEG/iOfjIFc=; b=WGDTafzo0wrRkQNADaiHqiKEG5TKUB1eN/Fw5peQNhU9gScbnI7yJpV0h3wqFnsCNF lT6cgZ8HtoyM6cdMoXn3G8IzZQCbJuegzS0bGv7pQ7ll2kNDRuRmTUJY8ygV2urYYTCT h1MRck14IGtBlEld7iNXIPNpM1/W0ki9TtcUbH1tQqMuU32QZOEzBotVC47XJfiISBWx rNx518buZruVi9uPmGCdnHc1nL/Sd9s4b9LG71TwkerbCKjMx3waPeg4jWyFMD7YUa55 tFg/Nso1vGE/0nCiiZbU+BSam0FrBM0Hj3aMbkG8GNvfrhxRyyx7S8E9hkKqi8RlKYJo XL2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=oV28/3CWs1lY4ivwJEiAJm4jYietAK3xdEG/iOfjIFc=; b=TZM8pOsYoa2/RmfdnrZsVaZYA7fMiRWS8VaP2gWLYedppK1gk4o2R247v9vdIyS/Fp LpRVxsMoXM5jUQeK9h3un+JcC0YWuSI8VnM5D190/WCQ0lzXBU5hfdVXw35I+H416W0x yyabC8b3txJTHvC52VuD6BONFOxuqwXOxKmZRc/X4fUC4unkERynvmc1pIQ/W60G2XMk qsDleYf47hzomlaghW65xvNjoWvRalgKbB7NGUq5sEiYMQ6X5YJPBlgkSmynd40qB94K vwgCO4z93KeQJhJ0ORi4eS1YT1J13c63SmTemZ2t0GTF9w6ML9pFOqH50HvqJogb8Srt NEIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXy0p0FwKS29HKtURL0ilHMZAHDUGmI5uFXOPDYI8T1905Wak0FQvuDXV9wVdNpyjqWBKbW+Q7y/SznyQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.15.150 with SMTP id 22mr24279328iop.155.1462543732027; Fri, 06 May 2016 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.39.2 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMF3MVsOhLaZ3aFAcy9-iC7fS3FNW3_=Dh+YR0Mx9H=VcjHTOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMF3MVt4j8xkd1R+fJ-96_U80S5SvkmcUqfcjJt0Ah1==FrYHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn7+JThcPpYdho3zpSj5fET8fc7aj9f6zC+oi_tmJKsRLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMF3MVsOhLaZ3aFAcy9-iC7fS3FNW3_=Dh+YR0Mx9H=VcjHTOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 19:38:51 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0R-HRodGBPUagSIWCtmmUU11T2I
Message-ID: <CAB75xn54Zd93dKrHr5hPKqx-+HWiO-P3VAUVbQs52oa6=_a8XQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113eec9a9db9cf05322cffb4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-hub-bangalore/D9MyUt853QL_rK7HEalsptK-4m0>
Cc: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org, "dhruv.dhody@huawei.com" <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-hub-bangalore] IP hop by hop routing with TE
X-BeenThere: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For IETFers in Bangalore, India" <ietf-hub-bangalore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-hub-bangalore>, <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-hub-bangalore/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-bangalore>, <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 14:08:56 -0000

Hi Sujay,

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:56 PM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> HI Dhruv
>
> Thanks for the link it is a good introduction and relevant details on the
> TE.
>
> So when you say PCE works currently with MPLS, I would typically need a
> controller (PCEP controller) with a TE database and BGP-LS
> for feeding the information, right?
>

​Yes!
​


>
> Which comes to the next question after PCEP controller has the TED, is
> running a CSPF path a part of the PCEP role, or an application has to be
> build over it?
>

​Both option exist. For in case of ODL, the application decides the path,
in some controller the path computation algorithm is built in. ​



>
> My use case is a single IGP domain requiring light-weight TE.
>
> Hence my choice would be a constraint based source routing mechanism. The
> intelligence for which can be calculated using OSPF-TE or ISIS-TE, but the
> question
> remains is how do set up the transport path without MPLS.
>

The protocol "PCEP" might not help you, but what if after computing the
path you use openflow to set the "flow" (in MPLS we would call that LSP) on
each node.

Another option would be SR with IPv6 in data plane.

​and then there is this - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-pcr-05
and http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1ca.html

Hope this helps!

Regards,
Dhruv​



> Regards,
> -Sujay
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sujay,
>>
>> PCE *currently* works well with MPLS (RSVP-TE signaling or Segement
>> Routing without signalling).
>>
>> If no MPLS, checkout https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3272/ which
>> might give you some ideas.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dhruv
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:37 AM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Group
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to do a hop by hop IP routing with guaranteed/reserved
>>> bandwidth for a certain traffic class.
>>>
>>> The decision should be dynamic, so i will need some IGP or EGP TE
>>> extension.
>>>
>>> So how can I do this with a central controller? (PCE??)
>>> And can I do this without a central controller ( equivalent to MPLS;RSVP
>>> -TE but without MPLS)
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Sujay
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ietf-hub-bangalore mailing list
>>> Ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-bangalore
>>>
>>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email