IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-hub-boston] Get together?

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 20 September 2019 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E61A1201B7 for <ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 06:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KDTnbhG23Out for <ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C830120147 for <ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1iBIjk-000Cz9-P9; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:14:12 -0400
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:14:07 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org
Message-ID: <5866E61B1B12E5A4F119B89D@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <4D29CA2C-BF28-480E-B6E4-640BA4B102F5@akamai.com>
References: <4D29CA2C-BF28-480E-B6E4-640BA4B102F5@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-hub-boston/RNo6EahySAI0XJLcd_YvewshuN0>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-hub-boston] Get together?
X-BeenThere: ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For IETFers in the Boston area." <ietf-hub-boston.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-hub-boston>, <mailto:ietf-hub-boston-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-hub-boston/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-hub-boston-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-boston>, <mailto:ietf-hub-boston-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:14:16 -0000

Also interested and will attend, schedules permitting. Prefer
Cambridge to Buriington (MA) but Burlington is certainly
feasible.  Manchester is not, certainly not on a late afternoon
or early evening schedule.

Other than things I've talked about already or more details on
that subject, the only other think I could talk about is whether
IETF has a future.

  john

--On Thursday, September 19, 2019 02:17 +0000 "Salz, Rich"
<rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> Should we try to get together before the November IETF?  Tech
> talks or social?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email