Re: [Ietf-hub-boston] Future meeting schedule

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 06 November 2019 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E425612006B for <ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:05:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.684
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.684 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELF6hgx4fPFZ for <ietf-hub-boston@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30C312002E for <ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id SCZAiICOIzcHQSCZUi6z0M; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 04:05:28 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1573013128; bh=p67lWi9gXOBFu28AnEq+8XE8SkjJiTnp72WYpjGO90s=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=aAs1YGuUlStOOjINmj0EIe+VpIx9prUQvDqIHgGyxgPNtXT0VsvjHYlLAHhYrY9Lf 1eLHD64wPkE09CKZ97Ip5+Nqeq+RfBmCIDPhhn3YiVhjx0okxJoZuTIYH+57LmjWfn MRp4/bHmCwcqnFfn3WoLYGr22Wz4TC+0RZEBuuu+RdZruhS9hB7Q77S3s15eId8nSZ EORLMaNYjDGwiRnpjmMe5TQShP3nf9S5pRaommz9gU2QibRyl0vIhU58doGaWLIdgm xb08A5J6XmgdnR8LVH45onDHGjPLlmvYhZOonnishmvCK0Xbb+kug8zmQcrlHFJlFw HgesAG4ZHeNgw==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4600:1e00:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id SCZSiTRnL1rYrSCZTiE1dF; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 04:05:27 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id xA645OZd008126; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 23:05:24 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id xA645NdY008122; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 23:05:23 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <9DDCECC2-6B92-4D8C-8465-D1D134469832@fugue.com> (mellon@fugue.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 23:05:22 -0500
Message-ID: <87r22l8xa5.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-hub-boston/YhBxXk9S4-N0MqY3t0EFISOpdZc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-hub-boston] Future meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For IETFers in the Boston area." <ietf-hub-boston.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-hub-boston>, <mailto:ietf-hub-boston-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-hub-boston/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-hub-boston@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-hub-boston-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-boston>, <mailto:ietf-hub-boston-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 04:05:31 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> writes:
> For my part, I'm actually more interested in low effort frequent
> meetings that not everyone gets to than high effort infrequent
> meetings that.. not everyone gets to. I'm not claiming that's right,
> just sharing my impression.

I'd like to know your definition of "low effort" and "high effort" here.

Dale