IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 01 September 2020 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEE13A0B93 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G5kzWZ5C4JoQ for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B1D3A0B92 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id AEBD67C5C45; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:37:45 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=2620:0:2d0:201::1:74; helo=pechora4.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=cowan@ccil.org; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora4.lax.icann.org (pechora4.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:74]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2500F7C5BFB for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:37:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora4.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C22170004B2 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:37:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id x12so1217432qtp.1 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sOFWpnDkNMloy54+nZsI6GXw6+VV9DCaHlPwl3JrMcM=; b=IEUePK4f2ze+VRvHrohBMjGJ5wx/r+b5lLvcHs07s1sorQaeuwe2kLQYdW11Hnnix0 Wsem3A317UjsU/+vG620d5DOosZHW4aS8C+BcX9r4OoDxQ/fyecMmqAb3NlCbECUpObE jl3mmjZ0haRr45SWgHgNOX4zEj8+HgOyox47B1I4CwHla6Lt4BKxdh4dgAQ1aUwSWTVW gbQ0KXUcPL86RAuJOeQk0+DTyfB1aaX/DV3z747npveZKju6rgMoSbR9oEO0snEefHok vtSSY5Adtu4pI9wBQtwokTb1YZ6uW2lh7R87chW/aB52c2lxVtO1vPgNDTvbZshxrcf3 P1Eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sOFWpnDkNMloy54+nZsI6GXw6+VV9DCaHlPwl3JrMcM=; b=NweBN37BT/vZBZUIxu75gO39g6V0uainu5mMb0IrUO3vcR/U8+WiPlUl8ImpBRlb3O zm0+bHM/++EwdZd+LEzVJ/F2odlSEgcI9kNVF9n3AtLZNa7Cx0lEK6wZwJQCWyGOntq3 cPSvbBvAYHJIDJsaQ67N/K3IQn8khGhIiEjVZqYN/Fops68LvawkNZjNGzp4hS7dXc2W ivrvCDgrzzH6WnAy3W7+RZwlBdHtPSS5yGZuvJN7HSzZguc7ARykPaWYm2zRuRTc2Q+a LydHNAhhVU/2zgGJsjJYDXFlJ3yNztyq55p+R0/GZcRa3DEuW4gJsoiiO23uQH1B7MoN vT9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kuM7jlpFho8hQGDHfr8lyyq/lyvRxD2XSUHFWbeC+a3iAyrGW KGovGxlGq/kaZpqab7ieNaIT4o3RvXfsqJ1qoinDIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjaW+YIH3WTyD8Kcht3fJcgKbAwno11b9lpTVjIAVLMNnlu+sHB01++EyyfVuIRTtAFEoNiAIlqDUyuOoSX0c=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c90:: with SMTP id y16mr2357718qtv.45.1598974641765; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANNmbuVto_acaYc8SFHEY_=OLdp7FRua=1vqXLSFS16TJhezuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANNmbuVto_acaYc8SFHEY_=OLdp7FRua=1vqXLSFS16TJhezuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:37:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_QWu95p_P2aLvPZ3DkFCXaftTgs0_d6K2WPZcoXcPhmUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lenny Soshinskiy <soshial@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087186f05ae424b47"
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (pechora4.lax.icann.org [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:37:43 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/-nWQGPiur9Tp-EICFeJHnBWgSxk>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:37:50 -0000

The applicability of the date seems a little vague, as if the transition
happened in 1910.  How about "vecaa"?  The "aa" represents the long "a" of
the proper "ā" letter, which cannot be used in subtags.  It also makes the
subtag 5 letters long: "veca" would be incorrect because it looks like a
script subtag (though there is currently no such subtag).

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:45 AM Lenny Soshinskiy <soshial@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1. Name of requester: Leonid Soshinsky
> 2. E-mail address of requester: soshial@gmail.com
> 3. Record Requested:
>
>    Type:        variant
>    Subtag:      pre1910
>    Description: Latvian language in the old orthography used before 1910s
> ("vecā druka" in Latvian)
>    Prefix:      lv
>    Comments:    The subtag represents the old orthography of Latvian
> language used during c. 1600s–1920s. It was first described in 1863
> by August Bielenstein in his book "Die lettische Sprache, nach ihren Lauten
> und Formen". The orthography has been been official for Latvian language
> till new orthography was approved in 1908 and fully adopted in 1930.
>
> 4. Intended meaning of the subtag:
>
>    The old orthography of Latvian language used during c. 1600–1920s
>
> 5. Reference to published description of the language (book or article):
>     -- Pēteris Vanags. LATVIEŠU VALODA PIRMS LATVIJAS VALSTS (link:
> https://www.president.lv/storage/kcfinder/files/VVK_Raksti%2C_10._sejuma_fails.pdf
> )
>     -- August Bielenstein. Die lettische Sprache, nach ihren Lauten und
> Formen -- Riga: 1863–1864
>     -- Rīgas Latviešu biedrības Zinību Komisijas Ortogrāfijas Komisija.
> «Uzaicinājums latviešu pareizrakstības reformas lietā» – 1908. – Nr. 263. –
> 12. (25.) nov.
>     -- Ina Druviete. „Kārlis Mīlenbahs”, -- Riga: Zinātne, 1990 (chapter
> "Vienotai rakstībai un izrunai", link:
> http://www.vvk.lv/index.php?sadala=192&id=620)
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email