Re: [Ietf-languages] Language subtag registration form

Ben Scarborough <scarboroughben@gmail.com> Wed, 25 November 2020 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <scarboroughben@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A493A03F4 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:27:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GonrJA6HZde0 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E2D3A03EC for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 5DCFC7C64B6; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:27:31 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=2620:0:2d0:201::1:71; helo=pechora1.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=scarboroughben@gmail.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora1.lax.icann.org (pechora1.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:71]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA017C649E for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:27:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora1.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A644700045B for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id z12so619989ilu.8 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:27:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IhjTLj28fU+ZTzqAsM+b+/p+62t7gYBB6K5Cvy5SFuE=; b=MepGDq6Pe2skmE2qKOcJSebySDx7p+mGeH//aCswiAEZjM8FUocixZev6Qm5f/uNYH xSRLqkhk5bVtjhXmJjvlyRRBHarIEVW2RTEVn3Xcou01J4usTIVX2fh8LTtLyRG98LWc obuboFy1QjDDR+f9DkayhIhw2HeTtFIV/1V5dnLPGduEV81/OGndUmGntYRtbMo8G35U Qf3hsBS5Xac59Yz0ONWv+3i2hgaqXX9IMpSg1JJeGw8/0YkMBz4UEaKcRWNcJcwXtFke znOpxDYAWFFLDoiEIoVYK0sIyPWGfwL+JzF98U1FzRAvQs8Oxa+eHzqZXmnffcuMfBLG yWjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IhjTLj28fU+ZTzqAsM+b+/p+62t7gYBB6K5Cvy5SFuE=; b=OJUJ1sNOT+GcQ8FRBY8oaxv9moxJHIsepZuRin/vhhRjz54IEeH3f3v9IFQ6HXP6f4 oldJy64BMU/ef0HJ9LbhSP+Fp+2YfzKYoyi3M4fW+dwdKyT8rXw0bNekgLl9ePPPuMCd YE0OYkxy+HyC3SQF8Z2a5cuAdmjDKfkrmdYen4WSrSFibYcQ1AtHm0iVaNtAyz/Vu4HQ kF/jied7D5ALoj1gbcfgAMmNnD2SQAmiRmt0KtzjSKYpFpPdEU28jUdPwYkCLFAtew6o Czza1qMNwKMqga32sK8qDpTWL+bjVWtkPtuFrDaAugBCc9/yy0HgJIOPTIeYrxYRwux3 CGZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315gdCpmUcBnl57dT8SmeuVUURTFvcPddzaIdCTe5ufkg3TMDwE qbQ9su0DgrwVhq4NLko6PwHTleI2grXx+H3dkXSq+H4v918=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRQrcMqxYuHTavElCz1wRwIdYRcPtb4OhjxngENaYNdZMGZ8kcDo9ZYkbYyZuyXkKl3IL8J2g9i+PhfjNh5kc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:c2b:: with SMTP id q11mr1034319ilg.18.1606267627930; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:27:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ben Scarborough <scarboroughben@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:26:56 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKZQS2_duaAxjWqTPnusi8-OAtUnpG0zm26=yuGgg-KnAM6RmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-languages@iana.org
Cc: drude@xs4all.nl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (pechora1.lax.icann.org [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/5NBztbjZsRhfW6qByoz-wUa4G0A>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:22:49 -0800
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Language subtag registration form
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:27:36 -0000

Sebastian,

Thank you for the feedback. I have no personal attachment to the word
"sociolect," but Halvelik referred to his three works (Arcaicam
Esperantom, Popido, and Gavaro) as La Sociolekta Triopo, or the
Sociolect Triad. The word is thus already associated with Arcaicam
Esperantom even if it wouldn't be considered accurate usage.

I will gladly amend my form if the opinion is that "sociolect" is not
a suitable term to use here.

—Ben Scarborough


On 2020-11-24 23:37, Sebastian Drude wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>this is the first time I reply directly to such a request, please
>forgive me if I do mistakes or do not know the correct procedures.
>
>I agree with the proposal; it makes sense to me to have a subtag for
>this variety of Esperanto.
>
>I only do not agree with the characterization as a "Sociolect" -- a
>variety of a language which is characteristic for a certain (social)
>group within the whole speaker community.  As the applicant explains,
>the same speakers/writers may use it in the same text, so this is
>(according to the upcoming ISO TC 21636) clearly some kind of
>*register*, not a sociolect.
>
>Which brings us back to the question of how in the future the 8
>dimensions identified in ISO TC 21636 can be reflected/applied in the
>current frameworks, in particular BCP 47).  Are there members of this
>group who would like to participate with me in a working group that
>would work out proposals for that?
>
>(Now I see that in point (4) of the proporal 'Arcaicam Esperantom' is
>also correctly identified as such, so the characterization as sociolect
>in (3) is probably a mistake or misunderstanding.)
>
>Best wishes,
>
>Sebastian
>
>--
>
>Museu P.E. Goeldi, CCH, Linguistica ▪ Av. Perimetral, 1901
>Terra Firme, CEP: 66077-530 ▪ Belém do Pará – PA ▪ Brazil
>drude@xs4all.nl ▪ +55 (91) 3217 6024 ▪ +55 (91) 983733319
>Priv: Tv. Juvenal Cordeiro, 184, Apt 104 ▪ 66070-300 Belém
>
>On 23/11/2020 19:15, Ben Scarborough wrote:
>> LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
>> 1. Name of requester: Ben Scarborough
>> 2. E-mail address of requester: scarboroughben[at]gmail.com
>> 3. Record Requested:
>>
>>     Type: variant
>>     Subtag: arcaicam
>>     Description: Arcaicam Esperantom
>>     Prefix: eo
>>     Preferred-Value:
>>     Deprecated:
>>     Suppress-Script:
>>     Macrolanguage:
>>     Comments: "Archaic" Esperanto sociolect defined by Manuel Halvelik
>>
>> 4. Intended meaning of the subtag:
>>     Arcaicam Esperantom (Arkaika Esperanto) is a modern-made "archaic" register
>>     of Esperanto, meant to be the literary equivalent of lines or phrases in an
>>     old language such as Latin or Middle English embedded in what would otherwise
>>     be modern text. It features minor but nontrivial changes to vocabulary,
>>     grammar, and spelling. It is not meant as an overhaul of nor as a
>>     replacement for Esperanto.
>>
>> 5. Reference to published description
>>     of the language (book or article):
>>     Halvelik, Manuel. "Arkaika Esperanto: La verda pralingvo." 2010 edition.
>>     http://www.universala-esperanto.net/index_htm_files/Arkaika%20Esperanto.pdf
>>
>> 6. Any other relevant information:
>>     Because Arcaicam Esperantom uses different orthographic rules, the existing
>>     'hsistemo' and 'xsistemo' subtags would not have any relevant meaning in
>>     conjunction with the proposed 'arcaicam' subtag.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages