IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization)

Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> Sun, 30 December 2018 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <everson@evertype.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFEF1276D0 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=evertype.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Abv9E61zNAER for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BFF112008A for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 772D77C59B7; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:08:47 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F5C7C59B5 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:08:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=evertype.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TL6cPt9R0IP7 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:08:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=192.0.33.72; helo=pechora2.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=everson@evertype.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora2.lax.icann.org (pechora2.icann.org [192.0.33.72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EDA7C5985 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:08:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk (scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk [77.72.0.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora2.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF9B1E010A for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 01:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evertype.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SIwoFnvqqVztv9TijGCJ9+0y7vj0kPRglArQ/UWlobE=; b=ponUiH+YQucDBqFJ/+xIMldiA OBYrjo/zDzqbmzSHiw8pKtE/GIxJ9/kDGB09oJ01zpOJNHwYVvrHsNf9VrbGy8KK/SeJ96I2by2oE yyG11xgEbxnh0EGaKN9jLokCVL;
Received: from cpc139632-dund15-2-0-cust239.16-4.cable.virginm.net ([92.237.223.240]:64820 helo=[192.168.0.18]) by scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <everson@evertype.com>) id 1gdPaW-002f9a-Re for ietf-languages@iana.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 01:08:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20181228175331.D0B2E7C5B8A@mork.alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 01:08:17 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE5F03EA-C80F-4869-A3E7-B9D509A145FD@evertype.com>
References: <CAGHjPPLp2r_3_qKV0fyGb0uax_4NvVWebTziUiAhrTp07NiNQQ@mail.gmail.com> <04FE1C2F-3BBC-4AA3-9B43-D8B1A9A23A77@evertype.com> <20181228175331.D0B2E7C5B8A@mork.alvestrand.no>
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - iana.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - evertype.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk: authenticated_id: everson@evertype.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk: everson@evertype.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/5W7aly_d9hM6UJb7L5byAbB1MSU>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 01:08:51 -0000

Hanyu Pinyin is what is referred to by “pinyin”. I think that this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongyong_Pinyin#Comparison_between_Hanyu_Pinyin_and_Tongyong_Pinyin shows enough differences to warrant distinguishing the two. 

> On 28 Dec 2018, at 17:53, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
> 
> Should we review the lengthy discussions that took place here from August to October 2008, and revisited in September 2009, concerning the ‘pinyin’ subtag and whether or not Tongyong was included in its meaning?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email