IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] Tongyong Pinyin bites the dust (was: Pinyin)

Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> Tue, 01 January 2019 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <everson@evertype.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56D81200D7 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:35:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=evertype.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wo4HrUP_lUfC for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A971200B3 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 8E3987C56C9; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:35:06 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570E17C3C42 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:35:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=evertype.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hif4JnVcq5FR for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:35:04 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=192.0.33.72; helo=pechora2.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=everson@evertype.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora2.lax.icann.org (pechora2.icann.org [192.0.33.72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323787C56C9 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:35:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk (scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk [77.72.0.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora2.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EC61E0258 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 23:35:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evertype.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=W+KnPBnalUex+mZgAp0E9xV1CHuzpN5A0n7GZKOLcGg=; b=VxjZd05CThc5f4sxAN7Or0wjN 4sBwhhOu5+bBAjAzKQlCXzfpxR7DBmx2mp+rKlQ8XToik5zt64csA+ZVASxQ4j4h8YLcA/ogtkCP5 gz7TUsNeXb3AQb2LZ9H2g5g7iZ;
Received: from cpc139632-dund15-2-0-cust239.16-4.cable.virginm.net ([92.237.223.240]:52733 helo=[192.168.0.18]) by scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <everson@evertype.com>) id 1geTYU-00736P-WD for ietf-languages@iana.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:34:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20190101233218.6390D7C56C9@mork.alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:34:38 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <442FBB84-F4A6-4007-91ED-D0E29A30B0E8@evertype.com>
References: <mailman.5643.1221690552.6324.ietf-languages@alvestrand.no> <2652D8C8A8F14C8C85834B9FD2383AC2@DGBP7M81> <20080918030403.GL4058@mercury.ccil.org> <522DF494-A5BF-4508-93EC-F3138B9D2F7C@evertype.com> <20190101233218.6390D7C56C9@mork.alvestrand.no>
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - iana.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - evertype.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk: authenticated_id: everson@evertype.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk: everson@evertype.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/D-cUMEt6eIrfBZJwQoyys8nh_JA>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Tongyong Pinyin bites the dust (was: Pinyin)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:35:11 -0000

Well, did you review it and find anything of concern?

My view is that if zh is replaced by jh etc then it’s not the same system. 

Michael

> On 1 Jan 2019, at 23:31, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
> 
> I’m not going to fight this proposal. I just wanted to make sure the discussion 10 years ago was considered.
>  
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>  
> From: Michael Everson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2019 14:42
> To: IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Tongyong Pinyin bites the dust (was: Pinyin)
>  
> No one had asked for it though.
>  
> M
>  
> > On 18 Sep 2008, at 04:04, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
> >
> > Doug Ewell scripsit:
> >
> >> Unfortunately, this doesn't cause all existing Tongyong Pinyin content
> >> to vanish off the earth, and so if there was a need to tag Tongyong
> >> content before, that need has not gone away.
> >
> > True.  But it also means that we don't have to worry about how to
> > represent Tongyong at this stage, since no one has asked for it.  We can
> > decide later or never.
> >
> > --
> > John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email