RE: Another attempt at plain language

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Tue, 15 September 2015 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <petercon@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B147C5A8F for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDftIziIspix for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:33:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:14:27 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.109]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769A17C5A8E for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:33:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=lBSM88HHjke9IKIz/sFLLfyvTv1uZ8lYGsfLHY97I1g=; b=hrrWK45HzEuY88N/T8kg+kPpOIUJ01CzhDKk3aHz8+56NYtYWfNd7sQs1xo2Pw2yf97MMnzNUgDcjWQrFdxwaJ8uqSu3KnI6RW3XRrqUJ0yAYQ5hDu7ZWg2qXBdH93VPezvy/uhOsVkt9oHq32bgp1sIVOQEQTDfhqTG3SgPT58=
Received: from BY2PR0301MB1608.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.28.26) by BY2PR0301MB1607.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.28.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.268.17; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:18:35 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0301MB1608.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.28.26]) by BY2PR0301MB1608.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.28.26]) with mapi id 15.01.0268.017; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:18:35 +0000
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
Subject: RE: Another attempt at plain language
Thread-Topic: Another attempt at plain language
Thread-Index: AQHQ7MFXsRccRM+zZEqfdyHESsogMZ43qjuAgAAHvYCAAARjgIAAC2KAgAAahwCAAOkWgIAByCCAgAAGyICAAAm0gIACHqig
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:18:35 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB1608F132832A353E527C8EA4D55C0@BY2PR0301MB1608.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20150911114034.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.2d59df3fda.wbe@email03.secureserver.net> <BLUPR03MB137869AD3EB9D03F3941C62C82500@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20150911191203.GA7765@mercury.ccil.org> <BLUPR03MB137858D047C2E4A29AD4673782500@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BLUPR03MB1378F38B475273F4277E351D82500@BLUPR03MB1378.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAMZ=zj7-pd3qjHVyq7OHFhq1jrB48+yLRZ8XQZu_kg6Mf9MyGQ@mail.gmail.com> <93AD67FB-C7DF-41B9-95A0-BB6E1AEBA0F6@evertype.com> <mt42f5$2hb$1@ger.gmane.org> <4E788F2B-BAF1-4B3E-A110-656E737F1524@evertype.com> <CAJ2xs_EUDJpKhf_-ZV643sy-m4ADpArNS=t9d-zGyjn_-br48A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2xs_EUDJpKhf_-ZV643sy-m4ADpArNS=t9d-zGyjn_-br48A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=petercon@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8::64c]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0301MB1607; 5:7xDnFNysQQlrKm9Ws5bueGyxj90yZnbRjha9CE0Z7SQRv3OURsCLmj0RiMPVStQQLa59buT6XaSoe4VAbcGKXboFDGLMZ3jUk8Kp67TB3cbpntRaN6RZ07dpVBlL6EpsdHMiQy34IAFWIneaT0mFOQ==; 24:qO2LQNkFiGlxWfchMG4OUApiHK/ngP4oLSQ9yGKAqAl9fPGJ2yKISrxF/w0HVJRcRMoVmWgkQu/yx8Z4Ib3pcwdLnAuB/CuUAZLNk/DNdck=; 20:wzcHfYq937+ahQ6fPJKN2DvtHw6RTNLh0HN/LLyHl92KPHBV+zAEA1GQ6EyOcRwf+K9uYKKKMRgO8LmPiOA1qg==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB1607;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0301MB1607BC5E9851A6224AA5F651D55C0@BY2PR0301MB1607.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425019)(601004)(2401001)(520078)(520075)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(61426019)(61427019); SRVR:BY2PR0301MB1607; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB1607;
x-forefront-prvs: 070092A9D3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(54356999)(10400500002)(5001960100002)(4001540100001)(19609705001)(76176999)(10290500002)(5005710100001)(77156002)(81156007)(97736004)(87936001)(68736005)(46102003)(15975445007)(10090500001)(50986999)(19625215002)(76576001)(86612001)(101416001)(16236675004)(8990500004)(19300405004)(74316001)(92566002)(2950100001)(189998001)(33656002)(5001860100001)(2900100001)(62966003)(93886004)(5007970100001)(19617315012)(40100003)(102836002)(77096005)(5004730100002)(5001830100001)(5001770100001)(106116001)(105586002)(106356001)(5003600100002)(99286002)(122556002)(86362001)(11100500001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(64706001)(5002640100001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB1607; H:BY2PR0301MB1608.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR0301MB1608F132832A353E527C8EA4D55C0BY2PR0301MB1608_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Sep 2015 00:18:35.1457 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0301MB1607
Cc: "ietf-languages@alvestrand.no" <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>, Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:33:09 -0000

I have no problem with wanting to use a language tag to declare “this is a simplified variant” (relative to some other document that doesn’t have that).

But before proceeding with anything along this line, I think I’d want to see some input from linguistic experts that are dealing with this area generally — and by that, I don’t someone working just on accessibility. Content may be authored using controlled language in a variety of contexts for a variety of reasons. Rather than doing something one-off in response to someone interested in accessibility, I’d want to understand what the entire space looks like, what the various usage scenarios are, and from that whether one tag is enough, or whether there eventually need to be a set of tags with some systematic inter-relationships.


Peter

From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Mark Davis ??
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:49 AM
To: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
Cc: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no; Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: Another attempt at plain language


On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com<mailto:everson@evertype.com>> wrote:
I don’t know. A conformance statement? In any case it doesn’t seem taggable. There are books for early readers and young adults and college students but the difference of language use in those books is not precisely defined. Nor is the WCAG’s recommendation (or requirement) without ambiguity.

As I wrote, this is overly formalistic.

If the purpose is to distinguish webpages by BCP47 language tags, it is perfectly reasonable on a site to want to distinguish between a "normal" version, and a simplified version (not only for accessibility, but also for second-language speakers).

Of the many thousands of languages that are encodeable with BCP47, almost none of them have a "precise definition". It is not productive to disallow a reasonably clear variant because it doesn't meet a standard also not met by essentially any of the primary language subtags.

Mark<https://google.com/+MarkDavis>

— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —