IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] Khmer orthographic reform

Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu> Fri, 01 November 2019 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <roux.elie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE1B12083D for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1S1t_pgSYjB for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1977312020A for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id A59687C39EB; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:27:55 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2466E7C39D0 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:27:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4956aQwiaACc for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:27:52 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=2620:0:2830:201::1:72; helo=pechora6.dc.icann.org; envelope-from=roux.elie@gmail.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora6.dc.icann.org (pechora6.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 886747C36AB for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:27:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora6.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8801E01DA for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:27:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id r144so10535004iod.8 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+8cMQ3mGxS6XJHEecG3YRmlwFkKP2nThwFDU0z3ATus=; b=JkE+uBYhBi2ry8DCJDywNw+HVv6yw8I76blGCoCQDZfpHladcJvUZDwbXLZNHp/XhU S5XgPwyWfRab9nsS0xL6Pg3vtUO6s8SOg06mBBA7aSZKgfRRi75N1vc+k2XwfhF2dWxy 9Udejx8FPwNZUT1Yy0EthCr0KQKV/gFAA12C7ZQWu2SYvngHIiaMVyHmAkWTtRO6t3Qe T0ZjqJTCuvHxqRa8U6EQz0Xe35G4MeJws1J3FN7f7R4wBiaRehvZRnLI4Tgg79iqJK7a VwT9YlKS4viAYpuGwcwR5UvWdpiEhVQpJ0VjG5ONBq5SOfzCKK6KkiUM0NMYEf0LJtXP gOFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+t+RENokCvfyq+xThHyHT96vCAc70B093a2BxeAVyZS6JJF3k XYySvNoacERI5Wc+pkrF0w2PhGISINOISg88S8jHZ7Awh/4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMaa9v42FN3a9hfl0HiudDghYvPoIgDwHz9EEnbuMD78L8cfRMZqWtyzR2edzy9KxuL+99HgKbpKTfcIRzXG0=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:7160:: with SMTP id n32mr5150209jaf.120.1572607649249; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 04:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191031151719.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.38c22bee93.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> <CANfi1JhMoxP3JyUS76GzNA-p7Atg92mGysp-_2SU2AZXomsioQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANfi1JhMoxP3JyUS76GzNA-p7Atg92mGysp-_2SU2AZXomsioQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:27:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CANfi1Jigqj+hDjdRw783RW_uzUBZMS6FnVKTHO+feMYRWpygjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Cc: IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>, Chris Tomlinson <chris.j.tomlinson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/G_OTUjlKB1FoFn9WgwLtQw9ASSo>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Khmer orthographic reform
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 11:28:06 -0000

Here's a small doc with a timeline and some sources:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i4BIi5oRxr9x0gZMjQs00bFNMKSLW2j3Iiszvdtl8Y8/edit?usp=sharing

I think my proposal would be the subtag "-kmpre20c", indicating a
spelling of Khmer predating the reforms of the 20th century. Looking
at the timeline I can't really find a better name... Would that be a
reasonable request or are there some red flags?

Best,
-- 
Elie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email