Re: Another attempt at plain language

Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com> Fri, 04 September 2015 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECF67C0D2A for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-NE2LwRtION for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:11:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF307C052E for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:11:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by lbbmp1 with SMTP id mp1so7039690lbb.1 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 01:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9bs9ceQ4L5HlNqj0bWpMVOMhZmXhvS0Csf7SLfTQsD0=; b=pecNX3ExghAdIHFEX9wxCaoUP2rkvpvWI/MGMwEUZFXX9xsRCFTSf/CQcOOHiigtr5 7Az0YmMoUbsOJWM8TiE3o7J+kyucap1yFwQYBWkJlFtv7N8f/cEswGqmYF92NW+O0bcs 5FQpfb4oUfZnEEwrzkGixFtZ+0PcpGyeG1lSxxB453rBuF/uEji+HqKAm4FrhL0KA6X5 ZyaaLFq+tYuyiFMrMqee0AkvZyMSDxlyNDzScw7oymATA3429k+JYkS1Aa/2KHx/1r/V E01PeU6TN4vP2YYhf6EAqqLYPH0u5mhpTNoJypRg6FFKQbKIpXcsUi/lAq3x2nLRvUS4 ESCA==
X-Received: by 10.112.137.164 with SMTP id qj4mr2350774lbb.105.1441353787138; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 01:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.140.134 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 01:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55E933AC.40200@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <ms59ua$c94$1@ger.gmane.org> <C109599A-31A5-4897-8C4D-E9E210538F1D@evertype.com> <20150903033328.GA9078@mercury.ccil.org> <BY2PR0301MB1608E6C1C828DE936F073E40D5680@BY2PR0301MB1608.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <55E933AC.40200@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
From: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:02:47 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Tu3IKJHi7GC2LU20ukLOvYEY-GI
Message-ID: <CAJ2xs_H+7KccyZnKDZF7VTzMOwRtH-UPppf0ow+oYLMNinN4Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Another attempt at plain language
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115fd1c7a6962051ee75431"
Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "ietf-languages@alvestrand.no" <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:11:21 -0000

I agree with Martin that it would be certainly in scope as a BCP47 variant.

However, if it ends up not being added as a BCP47 variant, one could file a
ticket <http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/newticket> for consideration as a
BCP47 *locale* variant. The syntax would be a bit different, eg
en-u-va-plain vs en-plain.




Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis>

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
wrote:

> On 2015/09/03 14:02, Peter Constable wrote:
>
>> Coincidentally, there has been a project going on within ISO TC 37/SC4 to
>> create a Technical Specification, "Language resource management —
>> Controlled natural language (CNL) — Basic concepts and general principles".
>>
>> I thought these excerpts from a draft might be of interest for this
>> discussion (I'm extracting only a few portions, which I am assuming to fall
>> within fair-use allowances of copyright laws):
>>
>
> Although many properties of CNLs and their environments have already been
>> identified... CNL itself has the four properties listed below...
>>
>
> 3. It is an engineered (i.e. constructed) language: this means that it is
>> explicitly and consciously defined, and is not the product of an implicit
>> and natural process, even though it is based in turn on a natural language
>> that is the product of an implicit and natural process.
>>
>
> It strikes me that point 3 in particular would suggest that CNLs are very
>> much within the scope of BCP 47.
>>
>
> I would agree, and guess that many on this list would agree, that a
> specific and well-defined CNL would be in scope (mostly through a specific
> variant subtag registration) for BCP 47.
>
> I think the point where we see many different and conflicting opinions is
> on the value of registering some kind of general variant tag that would be
> applicable to simplified or controlled languages independent of base
> language.
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>