Re: Pending requests
Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com> Thu, 26 November 2015 21:46 UTC
Return-Path: <kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3AD7C567B for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:46:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5djCasglnX2d for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:46:22 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from pechora7.dc.icann.org (pechora7.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:73]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3877C54E1 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:46:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from v-smtpout1.han.skanova.net (v-smtpout1.han.skanova.net [81.236.60.154]) by pechora7.dc.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAQLk05j000856 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:46:21 GMT
Received: from [192.168.1.67] ([81.236.2.54]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id 247xawRqNoes1247yaeGza; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:30:56 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:30:52 +0100
Subject: Re: Pending requests
From: Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
To: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>, ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Message-ID: <D27D389C.33F4D%kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
Thread-Topic: Pending requests
Thread-Index: AdEokbme74ul5XxV50iBAjWFPSS6+w==
In-Reply-To: <1C7DA528-8048-42C9-8F1E-88812DF2F66A@evertype.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3531421857_20416638"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPQVu2J2lOQoVr90HrJu9gFjx5Y7cU2MjGQmZYkTCCbHqJHtlWOdox8cuImZrPsUV+PPxmEsGZp5iRISE/u8cACp4/E1oWl/qf8x1/mMBQPXccdpoD3SjQN8LLO5mzxZSpdv0XyeYtU7mjCWdTjmKFU0nbf4dTNOowTkjP17j8Np45ve5k80W/woH5g32U2LpL/kwQM38tvZ97jdkQtivBk=
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:15:03 by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (pechora7.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.73]); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:46:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:46:24 -0000
Den 2015-11-26 18:31, skrev "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>: > On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:22, Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com> wrote: > >> Hmm, not sure I (as a non-native user of English) would regard the >> (supposedly) "Basic" version to be simpler in any way than the “ordinary" >> version. I would regard the "Basic" version as strange, and in several places >> *harder* to understand than the "ordinary" version. > Sure. That might be a > drawback to Basic English. Different types of texts would require different > kinds of substitutions and circumlocutions. But we aren’t judging Basic > English. We’re identifying it with a subtag. Yes, but as Mark (and, I think, Shawn) say: this is of very marginal use, and should be at very low priority, and could wait, perhaps indefinitely. Den 2015-11-26 19:34, skrev "Mark Davis" <mark@macchiato.com>: > At this point, I've pretty much given up on this process. Someone comes in > with a legitimate need for variant that would be deployed on wikipedia (a > pretty darn'd high-volume site), and be generally useful. What happens? > This gets sidetracked into promoting an obscure variant that will get vanishingly > small usage. With regard to wpsimple, I don't like it, since it is (more or less) for Wikipedia only (and then only for one or a few languages); even though Wikipedia is "a pretty darn'd high-volume site". [Regarding the CEFR scheme] Den 2015-11-26 18:33, skrev "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>: > This is a relatively novel and relatively unknown scheme, and is about speaker > competence and confidence, not about classification of textual content. A > given text may be understood at a B1 or C2 level, but the text would be the > same. I would not favour this approach. It's not particularly novel (it dates back to 1991, though it has been revised since). Nor is it particularly unknown. Especially not in Europe, but it is spreading around the world (ok, the latter is novel, and it is far from completely world-wide). But of the systems I have seen, it seems to be the only one with potential to become used world-wide in reasonable near-time. "not about classification of textual [or audio/video] content": Formally you may be right. But: 1) It can be interpreted as referring to content (and regularly is, but so far mostly for language education material, end then still be gradually building vocabulary, grammar, spelling, pronunciation, to the next level); there is of course no exactness here. 2) Is there another widely recognised scheme for referring explicitly to level of the content (text/audio/video)? "We" should not invent our own scheme. /Kent K
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- Pending requests Doug Ewell
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Mark Davis ☕️
- RE: Pending requests Doug Ewell
- Re: Pending requests Johannes Wilkes
- Re: Pending requests David Starner
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests David Starner
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- Re: Pending requests Mark Davis ☕️
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Philip Newton
- Re: Pending requests Philip Newton
- Basic English Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- RE: Basic English Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Basic English Mark Davis ☕️
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Basic English Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Basic English Michael Everson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- RE: Basic English Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests John Cowan
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- Re: Pending requests Philip Newton
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Basic English Doug Ewell
- Re: Pending requests Doug Ewell
- Re: Pending requests Doug Ewell
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Peter Constable
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests John Cowan
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Peter Constable
- RE: Pending requests Doug Ewell
- RE: Pending requests Doug Ewell
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Kent Karlsson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- RE: Pending requests Peter Constable
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- Re: Pending requests Michael Everson
- RE: Pending requests Shawn Steele
- Re: Pending requests Mark Davis ☕️