RE: Pending requests

Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> Wed, 25 November 2015 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED0A7C54FD for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:44:33 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFh9JZpax3OL for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:44:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from pechora7.dc.icann.org (pechora7.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:73]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDDEC7C54F9 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:44:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.102]) by pechora7.dc.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAPJiA8w012615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:44:30 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=U3KtY+11jYH7DGzJAFyEn/dh53NUd1ZE+5loBy6sgL4=; b=Qi7Ak7sktg2zIsMNvPUjS8rRMrhxzLY1/3ua6RZX2rQua8mMjzvwNipREjx7nEoPtYN2uS/kDCmNVTlYkZhHfFdliM4hR1aKL51SQMRuhORj0m0t6qlbCtfOg+MMAZQofF5LciEFm/7umqtMVB6Viv7jOdSvWixjg8L/9+SBCoc=
Received: from SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.226.154) by SN1PR0301MB2047.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.226.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.331.20; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:44:08 +0000
Received: from SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.226.154]) by SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.226.154]) with mapi id 15.01.0331.019; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:44:09 +0000
From: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>, ietf-languages <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Subject: RE: Pending requests
Thread-Topic: Pending requests
Thread-Index: AQHRJ7bsUNvLoTVlT02AterAlRDOdp6tH3XA
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:44:08 +0000
Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB2045BA7D6BED9E4505ADC48382050@SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20151125122404.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.e925470fdc.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
In-Reply-To: <20151125122404.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.e925470fdc.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:c::286]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0301MB2047; 5:6+H1LeXhTdVAc462hmUf/HfGhM1El24WfUD9YNdqkBENVZACUPs+uEhXXJ4Us9hNCjr1eBD2bSuBrV1korvc5Zs1ER8LBctGQAHTXmnPlrQxbmbki4jas/yheIILCTukLO+uCzass3y3UKI1Rr6O6A==; 24:AhPUqKOrUSJ7B/kRo2tpKeYqBGbumg7LcOMdAK7EV9NbpRw6ZhhYyjI6sXtpcypqXc6bA3VgpEgNnfB25wEZt/yt2kRZthMNZrhvKYZKB1s=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2047;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR0301MB2047F9A205468DB791AD87D882050@SN1PR0301MB2047.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425024)(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(61426024)(61427024); SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2047; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2047;
x-forefront-prvs: 0771670921
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(189002)(54356999)(106116001)(81156007)(92566002)(86612001)(5003600100002)(2950100001)(10400500002)(586003)(2900100001)(5005710100001)(122556002)(6116002)(8990500004)(1096002)(10290500002)(102836003)(76576001)(19580395003)(40100003)(5001960100002)(101416001)(86362001)(107886002)(10090500001)(77096005)(5008740100001)(189998001)(74316001)(33656002)(5001770100001)(50986999)(76176999)(97736004)(5002640100001)(106356001)(99286002)(87936001)(105586002)(5004730100002)(221733001)(1220700001)(15975445007)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2047; H:SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Nov 2015 19:44:08.8732 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0301MB2047
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (pechora7.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.73]); Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:44:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:44:34 -0000

Re: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.languages/10905 

I'm confused how Odgen's Basic English is interesting to the web in general.  My understanding is that it's a reasonably dead language.  tlh-pIqaD probably has more life than Odgen's Basic English.

It's also unclear to me that Basic English even counts as a dialect/variant of English.  Ethnologue uses the ISO 639-3 criteria for language identification:

* Two related varieties are normally considered varieties of the same language if speakers of each variety have inherent understanding of the other variety at a functional level (that is, can understand based on knowledge of their own variety without needing to learn the other variety).
* Where spoken intelligibility between varieties is marginal, the existence of a common literature or of a common ethnolinguistic identity with a  central variety that both understand can be a strong indicator that they should nevertheless be considered varieties of the same language.
* Where there is enough intelligibility between varieties to enable communication, the existence of well-established distinct ethnolinguistic identities can be a strong indicator that they should nevertheless be considered to be different languages.

Though "English" users could probably make sense of "Basic English", I suspect a native "Basic English" speaker would have as much success understanding normal "English" as an English speaker might with Germanic languages.  It may be that it should be classified as a variant of English, but it is not at all obvious to me that it is a variant rather than a closely related language in its own right.

What is the pressing need for a Basic English tag?

I'm much happier with the idea of a tag for "simplified language" as a general tag to be arbitrarily added to any language (which is a completely different think than what's being requested here).

If we do decide that "basic English" is a variant of English (I'd rather have language experts' agreement on that), then I'd prefer that it have a tag more like "-ogden" as -basiceng may lead people to expect more of a Voice of America type simplified English rather than a different language. 

-Shawn