Re: [Ietf-languages] Language subtag registration form

"P. Masih" <pmasih779@gmail.com> Sat, 22 February 2020 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pmasih779@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4763A09C8 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:32:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.181
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.181 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmI7ZGjsxS5u for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D9033A09C6 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id B19297C5190; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:32:20 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=192.0.33.72; helo=pechora2.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=pmasih779@gmail.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora2.lax.icann.org (pechora2.icann.org [192.0.33.72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC327C5139 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:32:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora2.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B4F1E05E6 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:32:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id p125so5229673oif.10 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:32:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XmadhCOR5RAJegL6RARUQnAYoOb/oVAx3VZIjOQm9Us=; b=HLhoRxq0XqQbTgsTvd/RhHoOSincS0lz+T6mH2tpR+fMmx45lBivyfcsaDCJYWIp+6 K4Y42HBOX1AKfMvNSpJhhddA7LIFjM8jWXuru1iSyKmHhbIeuk44E+6BlsyLn8iyRf8Q 9Xmys79fZAGegsHdHtlWEij86rFzyWIwzT0Nszjh6zHThotGYsI1biJwQR4U4j4nJ0SW Vwf1ENS9mSmQUYPep/zNzD30zW1wzHqw1GmR+lTL+ztmspk10RVUMuOptGPlxUqSiFNs RzgSmJvpOgODq1P9hm+P2YsgGqDbVm97GzKlDPg+DKMvRmx2Ob4q4ouEzj82Qv0smcPV wmiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XmadhCOR5RAJegL6RARUQnAYoOb/oVAx3VZIjOQm9Us=; b=rtIDXmW3/muzb/6bR6G9kgju9fdlQs6w8ncuk27Wmz54SIuQYdYjqUBnbjlqGa9SCc DIQ+jCNYjOu+QgggIZ+u9hr3Y/08YmOUiW0gSGnppA27n0pNVREVk1tMyOVphUS6Urqb qBaC+Clh+MKjG2GDc+0XpC0jzTPFUsiSXkExdNH1QE02GDkaKmSGma4sQRrz5wkPDAiC KBj3+Bob8XIFXPtGD0dfKrDUZ+/WxnnSCueU42Mv3qB7xhuAYtPa3nGsv1Q3xIQrD2K/ vLCIvSmVrgNsZSOl4mJFtGrnJrisyn+aZScwjphooiMKWlvBP6+aGtpfxeXRedVklulj VL/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVpluQwx1G+VpG3ZvtLQ9qI3GZYYD2T1ZebJJquYxbL2LEYCmJj HJQg4s2d4RVS4/vMmMcpp8zAPoo8dhz4DpocZgE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0GWjkkUIZjGH+XSoMitiHS0nAvXtYbTE5uyKKV7l1E+uOP2sflR0lyOlT2RY46/SLtDC20GWKrWED8GCDWGI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:aac:: with SMTP id r12mr7335150oij.59.1582403516263; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:31:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200221120806.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.97cb5ac37d.wbe@email15.godaddy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200221120806.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.97cb5ac37d.wbe@email15.godaddy.com>
From: "P. Masih" <pmasih779@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:31:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG08wutCahS4Hck_vAbgmCUC+Xr_VKiO0rezTxpaKSB3E7JSrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Cc: "ietf-languages@iana.org" <ietf-languages@iana.org>, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a702f059f3007e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/Rk2_HSSSb4qH27YDK6tmPv8vXHE>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Language subtag registration form
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:32:24 -0000

I am really happy that you are interested in my proposal and pay attention
to it. Thank you!

Le ven. 21 févr. 2020 à 20:08, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> a écrit :

> P. Masih wrote:
>
> > Thank you for this clarification. Is this better ?
>
> Yes, I forgot to mention that we could make that change for you. My
> version just makes a couple of minor additional spacing changes; for
> instance, the second line of the Comments field is required to begin with
> two spaces.
>
> I noticed we have an ambiguity in one of the fields in the registration
> form:
>
> > 4. Intended meaning of the subtag:
> >
> > Reference to the creator of the language, Giuseppe Peano
>
> This was supposed to refer to the intended meaning of the subtag itself
> ("what *entity* does this subtag refer to?), but P. quite reasonably
> interpreted it to mean "why did I choose this particular subtag *value*?"
> instead. I think in this context it should be fine.
>
> I will put together a proposed record and send it to the list. Of course
> we still need the Reviewer to weigh in, but at least the paperwork will all
> be in order.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
>
>