[Ietf-languages] EWTS transliteration tag: follow-up

Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu> Fri, 15 February 2019 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <roux.elie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC28130FB4 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:01:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.018, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id olTxDwE801Pz for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9C8131017 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 51BEE7C4025; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:01:15 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96727C4017 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:01:14 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ct4tyJDgSJC for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:01:09 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=2620:0:2830:201::1:72; helo=pechora6.dc.icann.org; envelope-from=roux.elie@gmail.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora6.dc.icann.org (pechora6.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1787C401C for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:01:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-yw1-f42.google.com (mail-yw1-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora6.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E0601E01C2 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u205so3734052ywe.1 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:01:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ayul3+5QGkGJdBtLiclrlGO1ahZ8Li+aUsQXOq2oPLU=; b=Hon4PbmRAjVXft29uBHmvy8AKVkIFMXMhdVd5VHhjKC2XupsryzEdS+OIP0BtS8ZGB 4eWyiHMRsSK7jMyHINugNONBUqtthmv4r3WK5ZNUDuI0MDSRXQHj6BYC74koSRaTnL7s pPlkpzOeKuWUKn6sxWseFd701wUiFXyUnmkVCC5TxIwo3hoetSROOAGFwqqCwmnyq4JT B5a6nGeKMikABYwYgniJ9zjzEuDvVsEmgelMiSu8SZaX3pVAFyE6mSMDkhFkOfmdpIhA m9bF/rwUx56hXDAxMlpuziapLHll2fhiNcLQyhg00CKf0W6B741OtLnNxzytIXcUkCqu XbHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubFSbtX7GqoyGQfAQVhxzHElsez8u6HNwgmNVaxLcejXArid/Yk K+DCMgcGUpLSECzA7Mr3TS7/FLJRt1EnTvn5cKTQk8U6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ia5EkD8sP0Dq689APZbARolMXNocXFuByKRkrX7vdb+TOvfBGnzFVsoCp1lGjg7dJ+gZAmNxizX8UPPUqhKxPc=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:9958:: with SMTP id q85mr7965236ywg.390.1550239244496; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:00:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:00:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CANfi1JgiMF1DX2H5Zm13CCDiJm7SyY5+2Q1oZh=k+h-=r3NcHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/Us_f85KKEBxvjouKpOIECZ884V0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:24:45 -0800
Subject: [Ietf-languages] EWTS transliteration tag: follow-up
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:01:24 -0000

Dear All,

I'm coming back to you about the EWTS and IAST transliterations. It's
been about a year now that I sent my initial email[0], and I have a
few follow-up questions:

About how many transliteration tag requests were filed since it was
decided to reroute them to CLDR? How many reached CLDR?

The reason I'm asking is because after 18 months, my two tickets to
include EWTS and IAST in CLDR ([1], [2]) are yet to see any progress
and I don't know what to do to normalize these tags.

CLDR 34 only includes 20 transliteration tags so there doesn't seem to
be any overflow of such tags that would need to be reviewed. Also, the
processing time for a request on this mailing list seems relatively
short (a few days/weeks), while the processing time at CLDR apparently
takes a few dozen months (other requests seem to take a similar amount
of time, see [3]). My point is not to judge or annoy anyone, but I'm
just asking for an acknowledgment of this situation that makes it
virtually impossible to register transliteration tags, and maybe for a
reconsideration of the process. What do you think? Could the automatic
delegation to CLDR be reconsidered?

Best,
-- 
Elie


[0]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/FNgXoA4FRbr5Oc2hkiSuPxVGQI0
[1]: http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10548
[2]: http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10547
[3]: http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/9895