IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization)

"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Mon, 31 December 2018 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BF2127598 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4BnOGhC37GNP for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0747112008A for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id EAC717C57D9; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:28:49 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BF97C57AF for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:28:49 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WxLnlWN3-8sz for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:28:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=192.0.46.74; helo=pechora8.dc.icann.org; envelope-from=doug@ewellic.org; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora8.dc.icann.org (pechora8.icann.org [192.0.46.74]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A93587C3298 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:28:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from p3plwbeout03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp03-02-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.218.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora8.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1D6C0353 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 03:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from p3plgemwbe03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.130]) by :WBEOUT: with SMTP id doF6gXKsKRt71doF6gLLmU; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:27:52 -0700
X-SID: doF6gXKsKRt71
Received: (qmail 16563 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2018 03:27:52 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Originating-IP: 73.229.14.229
User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 6.9.49
Message-Id: <20181230202750.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.1d9ffc7476.wbe@email03.godaddy.com>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>, ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:27:50 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (pechora8.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.74]); Mon, 31 Dec 2018 03:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfIKWLzOmeRieuzN54asI2kZDX5dzeRTMeLDUM/zjNO6cgDBWzywV0K9qC44NFigIzZvF1UvM+EsKpIMhWGEp15U4K3St/c0B1pONg+X1S82U3uMabMi6 m0AEionlDeT/ikC8HKQTlaCoQxvkY/Oakd22BeChIeO3+OtdOF7vJcIwMT9Gqs6sBCiLLVxcNrbrPrIGWSYdyTIiZQuEMZXZX+Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/UwmIWn32RUqI55dSQfUPcAxncbw>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 03:28:55 -0000

OK. Just to confirm for the record, this overturns the decision made 10
years ago.

I will make sure the forms are in order, as soon as Holiday Activities
subside.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant
subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization)
From: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
Date: Sat, December 29, 2018 6:08 pm
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>

Hanyu Pinyin is what is referred to by “pinyin”. I think that this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongyong_Pinyin#Comparison_between_Hanyu_Pinyin_and_Tongyong_Pinyin
shows enough differences to warrant distinguishing the two. 

> On 28 Dec 2018, at 17:53, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
> 
> Should we review the lengthy discussions that took place here from August to October 2008, and revisited in September 2009, concerning the ‘pinyin’ subtag and whether or not Tongyong was included in its meaning?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email