Subject: [Ietf-languages] Re: Review period extended for 'bh' and 'bih'
From: Doug Ewell <[email-masked]>
To: Martin J. Dürst <[email-masked]>, Sebastian Drude <sebastian_drude=[email-masked]>, Peter Constable <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 19:59:39 +0000
List-Id: "Review of requests for language tag registration according to BCP 47 (RFC 4646)" <ietf-languages.ietf.org>

Martin J. Dürst wrote:

> Am I correct that the proposed updated entry for "bh" is still the
> following?

Sorry for the delay in responding. Yes, the proposal is as you quoted, and is available here:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/S3gzRfMd4b7PtZWIoPhg0bWl3vs/

Removal of a subtag (or a grandfathered or redundant tag) is not permitted by BCP 47.

--
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org