Re: [Ietf-languages] Language tag for Han pinyin

Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> Tue, 31 May 2022 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B758BC15C00F for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lR05_SIj3VAP for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7CB9C14F741 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOPLPOB1E4 ([71.56.192.147]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id w2hanr0X3hMyJw2hbnff9m; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:18:32 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=AdR0o1bG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=629623b8 a=Y14bqovu780r7Ul73tIUrQ==:117 a=Y14bqovu780r7Ul73tIUrQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=nORFd0-XAAAA:8 a=MMLpqnODJL_MgYNe_2kA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=AYkXoqVYie-NGRFAsbO8:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: doug@ewellic.org
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: 'Richard Wordingham' <richard.wordingham=40ntlworld.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: ietf-languages@ietf.org
References: <20220527232636.3a045ad5@JRWUBU2> <CAD2gp_TL60_pPhQBVDY_Y6gf6qWwAFAy4vWXr+9Pz7dOQcZu6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ2xs_FADCdU4htmQ+A_tGXaeuEBHPGhKWePNO+aDkzBOF7NhA@mail.gmail.com> <20220529020131.23c43c8a@JRWUBU2> <000001d87319$2e79cae0$8b6d60a0$@ewellic.org> <20220529091237.73e38671@JRWUBU2>
In-Reply-To: <20220529091237.73e38671@JRWUBU2>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 08:18:30 -0600
Message-ID: <000201d874f9$4f007b60$ed017220$@ewellic.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFabOIMqSoaC4HzUDFpDVAcpTjBRADsYj7AAjgtKrMA/ir1egKXMtoYAZK0sSit8q6qMA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfM+oOezTZa1M2RpfsE31lRL8qqdaFZGf1X0s50bTtKjrHVPGUDVgyU+vrWJRzvIkKQxk6bKP0FY6OcqnipNFxhOTSv6QWHzNl6CE95/7pSWkfCXpQGXz P81YJcpqY6FNt6K4dwlNo0V8BuSptB/IKRIDOOhZsbe0Ww7YHQ8VASGqzK2YQQOglfoKF3mcXAIYuZoe6ahzqB/thlizXPWa78dDrk1XzAAl7cFiQ9WGMJDf 9BZw6Tt72uPZJxA65jixBwTW/Sy9aVwbqNlrlJO0ZDw=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/aHDS6Zh1-b9UKi7SsS4YTuu6vYI>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Language tag for Han pinyin
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of requests for language tag registration according to BCP 47 \(RFC 4646\)" <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 14:18:36 -0000

Richard Wordingham wrote:

> (In the application that prompted this question, English Wiktionary,
> the contrast within Chinese to be conveyed by the language tag is Han
> Pinyin v. Wade-Giles.  Script is mostly autodetected, generally using
> language as a cue.  I suggested using BCP 47 tags rather then non-
> compliant application-specific tags such as 'cmn-py' and 'cmn-wg'.)

I read this as saying there are actual examples in English Wiktionary of non-compliant application-specific tags such as 'cmn-py' and 'cmn-wg'. If so, that is disappointing.

Can you post a specific example from Wiktionary where such tags are being used?

--
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org