IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] Are BCP 47 collective language codes more suitable for zonal auxiliary languages than the "art" (Artificial) code?

Yaroslav Serhieiev <noomorph@gmail.com> Tue, 30 November 2021 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noomorph@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C2D3A1555 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:42:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YE2lLAnMjPoz for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1769B3A1544 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id v203so56474511ybe.6 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:42:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TcNqzovP8HzGsRWW2ggU1qRzfHf83LnNzRPge2w72Eo=; b=JZeAYgFb9inE18mpJlebf9VRvsLkSWEqxPXm3KDaHa9dh8Q49Vi69fkppZUqR2rHoS jg2tJlt4zQMmazrYrhfM9NSE+ZNkQH+pMxpylTNX8Q0PwCfiL7ycPMkr5DMANgYjAGJX dZTs4EOqQLQljBu0Smn4VO6bCQyQ3CLSikicYmrek6SPmfkfX0Kf8SPacx2TRf0EEuij qwJVOI8r0hUme8qBmALt7qLtPZYlDqwSxBS+52gTjPTq0X0AuVGdh04hCtWm+BEodMuq pLfDyK0tURCNoc1JoDMsCkBl2My1Yt+eO5gFIl16ov6F1BxpRh9xWXxVnyT/rTVKpo25 6gvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TcNqzovP8HzGsRWW2ggU1qRzfHf83LnNzRPge2w72Eo=; b=H2M6cQaiMwkLucpjuqd2rLuLRfS1RNFWmCgr8fbA/YLbkUWS/a2QR5d9fEKjibbIe9 vOu3iwz44trBndinsKScr+gquu4rsCLz79fEp/pcaLpHobo10IgCjJYSaqKtNpSEKelp E6iErr0NKfNQvuqK1N+9v2TtZMQpiDGnzXS0WpLKv+h20oHi7ftBtEzTVujqy+iC5/q9 OFpSsrys7D4pwOKm76Hf0rGrkMOX2aSSlqxK2DEqjiD01Uwu6Grzf1NpWE5Qv+ZoNg1g dH6UIkD/J2hzQdU0LsdaeRTDMhBzGYLthx9//prXLjUvz1e8NN2epA6DUG/SPyIervlS UvfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cZk1J8EdeRYT427m39EsXWldFzZbsezJcVZaEmKc8DjOq3pkb /b6A0KhnsuGG1KeRnWUiyWw7At8Q8giKGBz8ivTTsWZMSA8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4DBniMsX9TF2TStzWhP7kIZvsU2G7pQ1QH4S/9fyWU1Rggo0Sr2IDpSsshpYFZYTQiae7LOzA209nW+tH88w=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2e49:: with SMTP id b9mr925543ybn.414.1638304938236; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:42:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALTz4dJ-n6-Mx6_1zGDkQ4dCLr1iMWzywunYk_xhAZfwEHCxMQ@mail.gmail.com> <000001d7e4de$c654ae30$52fe0a90$@ewellic.org> <CALTz4dJs9ixCOj2mubgDH6PR3xwK2fUzP0MNAjEppPi2-4zpVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2gp_SVTbOu9EqbgmvVYUK-+Nbu2A+sKtuVs6UTy4_7Ya=v5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2gp_SVTbOu9EqbgmvVYUK-+Nbu2A+sKtuVs6UTy4_7Ya=v5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yaroslav Serhieiev <noomorph@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:42:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CALTz4d+AJn4-6X17hedPg6w_CMGd1jJTTxoapSUYden6PpSeFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>, ietf-languages@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e09f1005d20797c3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/jl3ePCHHs6i9Tq3PgkLxmJvFU1M>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Are BCP 47 collective language codes more suitable for zonal auxiliary languages than the "art" (Artificial) code?
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of requests for language tag registration according to BCP 47 \(RFC 4646\)" <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:42:25 -0000

Thanks for the clarification.

We conducted internal voting on our Discord server and have chosen
"art-x-interslv" as the preferred  choice.

Best regards,
Yaroslav.

вт, 30 лист. 2021 р. о 21:34 John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> пише:

>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 8:04 AM Yaroslav Serhieiev <noomorph@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> There's a lot of ongoing development in Interslavic projects and a
>> definitive answer to which temporary code we should use – `art-x-...`
>> or `sla-x-...` will bring some order to the minor chaos we have across
>> applications and libraries.
>>
>
> Well, the English Wikipedia page classifies it as a constructed language,
> as do the Russian, Polish, and Croatian counterparts.  The Interslavic wiki
> says it is a Slavic language.  These represent the "outsider" and "insider"
> views.  My view is that f the typical Interslavic user thinks of it as a
> Slavic language, then 'sla' is better; otherwise 'art'.  There are no
> fixed rules for this.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email