IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ietf-languages] Language tag for Han pinyin

Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com> Fri, 27 May 2022 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839A9C14F724 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 15:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ntlworld.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBgPcuWPOe-s for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 15:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpq2.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.57.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5059C14F6E5 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 May 2022 15:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [212.54.57.107] (helo=csmtp3.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>) id 1nuiPq-0000a1-DC for ietf-languages@ietf.org; Sat, 28 May 2022 00:26:42 +0200
Received: from JRWUBU2 ([82.27.122.109]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id uiPqnGRI245FHuiPqnEYfN; Sat, 28 May 2022 00:26:42 +0200
X-SourceIP: 82.27.122.109
X-Authenticated-Sender:
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.4 cv=e64V9Il/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=62915022 cx=a_exe a=lZfnwhydZ+7bl6OdZ0zTBw==:117 a=lZfnwhydZ+7bl6OdZ0zTBw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=oZkIemNP1mAA:10 a=MfDWBxX3Em4lo5wqL6gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1653690402; bh=7FQDqVLfdqRmSJ3gnLTcpM+KuinMiDRJOmToMYTcPZ8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=srMVlyz/55DZBt8kcfRNSHeky5wSheUb+FqY/hm2Wzyu1iUt2PUmMmOkMIPyToO9D ObjR2ANmAzLflVq1KUr8oDg+rv/hL5TxUvElnphLxe2H3LsXLCoLZ1570zNGcaBaMB HQhHQ1v0AbA320z2yTNobLJuBL2JBSMK9iRgyYWw5435eMWmLslyO3VTYe+3JBa495 buYBU47G5tXyikkigX7XuP2vie31dvT4NNw7CyAg99HGOCTDE+gnKnAI/Wf7sU9yut f5P4P7siH9ue+9+ydv2YQAICH5tLRJiSrO7BbSxjwMlKZTQJ3PSa6fZPGknM/MTXNZ BOY1DRyvW0vnw==
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 23:26:36 +0100
From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>
To: ietf-languages@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20220527232636.3a045ad5@JRWUBU2>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfP/gpaQlhOCmkOB5kIOnWLB6vS9jOFt0CFlwtqmDQLOxoDVl5ypdmysVRViB+37zg2Ib2ezt2sgFxAye8Hq51vefqGOfc10DVu979NtzGEU57Gvs5HEf REOz3dYo2QxlYbFpYaPv/f9aFn8hRpedKV1d33BzTw7GUh5zaP50Lo4eVI16G+UF5SGROqnA6ALZ03wpQiSw+U+72x4gK21Z3XM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/q0Kw4JINn7lWCjsbNajh82nztAI>
Subject: [Ietf-languages] Language tag for Han pinyin
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of requests for language tag registration according to BCP 47 \(RFC 4646\)" <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 22:26:49 -0000

In accordance with BCP 47, is the complete tag "cmn-Latn-pinyin"
supposed to be suitable for Mandarin in Han pinyin?  My qualm is that
the variant tag should have prefix "zh-Latn" when used for Chinese,
which suggests, contrary to other recommendations, that one should
rather use "zh-cmn-Latn-pinyin".  Do we perhaps need to add another
prefix to this and similar variants?

Richard.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email