IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Pending requests

Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> Tue, 15 December 2015 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890F97C60BD for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:55:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWJU0OER2wbj for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:55:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from pechora5.dc.icann.org (pechora5.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:71]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CD27C60BC for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:55:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0147.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.147]) by pechora5.dc.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBF0stbp025140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:55:15 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=lhOmfHaLTXNDF/B9/fAshSPuemghlTkdVKf+YSbjLNc=; b=fazOnZweTxzLd/yN7KPjRz+yEhFqRW4MBLf4Q+HRMaTTXj55RlZF2G/zw8Duf+mbAbDZFv4GRYqZTOXichSJZqDvToEfL+ENGleDxpf8PeCSrSaLjq1JbargPaoXDFmGzzRIEZaEJaTzBlYy18LpKkko2kppRVcR6/hbQtMyVPM=
Received: from SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.226.154) by SN1PR0301MB2048.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.226.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.355.16; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:54:54 +0000
Received: from SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.226.154]) by SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.226.154]) with mapi id 15.01.0355.012; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:54:54 +0000
From: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
To: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>, ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Subject: RE: Pending requests
Thread-Topic: Pending requests
Thread-Index: AQHRLG/zUNvLoTVlT02AterAlRDOdp7DMReAgAgcTiA=
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB2045B10FD84F884950A55E8C82EE0@SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20151201123911.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.731257223f.wbe@email03.secureserver.net> <EC505332-DA2F-4342-8D6C-E6E17753BE2B@evertype.com>
In-Reply-To: <EC505332-DA2F-4342-8D6C-E6E17753BE2B@evertype.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:8::5ef]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0301MB2048; 5:SepA3xtf6vGYmIpr/VnqywkQtby6G+LpJnBp9U5aewebZFMC4XkSvgRcUdsXiPgmTYkoRBgJBVGTEEpDX4Sqa+LQPuVw0l0NGlGMQpnZAwm7sihL/bEsgpAUYy9n/NFM82vGEeKwOSxrrqJGX70Jog==; 24:jBo7Ag5YGQv2EJLcGXWLe4D0ZaCwJYfEG8bbNLhJchScJcnNByr0F53cOP3NG2+J/wH9DUrXo5i0MT619WlumtM7/hGKY2YjIjaxweognic=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2048;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR0301MB2048D256E198072655AE761A82EE0@SN1PR0301MB2048.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(520078)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2048; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2048;
x-forefront-prvs: 07915F544A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(13464003)(189002)(377454003)(54356999)(77096005)(5002640100001)(2950100001)(11100500001)(92566002)(74316001)(15975445007)(101416001)(50986999)(2900100001)(76176999)(33656002)(1720100001)(6116002)(10400500002)(122556002)(10090500001)(8990500004)(5005710100001)(10290500002)(5004730100002)(586003)(1096002)(102836003)(5008740100001)(1220700001)(5003600100002)(221733001)(40100003)(19580395003)(99286002)(106116001)(97736004)(106356001)(105586002)(76576001)(19580405001)(81156007)(86612001)(5001770100001)(5001960100002)(86362001)(189998001)(87936001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB2048; H:SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Dec 2015 00:54:54.0952 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0301MB2048
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (pechora5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.71]); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Amir E. Aharoni" <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:55:20 -0000

I was out.....  I like simple.  I still don't like basiceng, however I suppose simple mitigates my concerns a little.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: December 9, 2015 1:03 PM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Cc: Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: Pending requests

It’s my intention to approve “simple” for generic use (with misgivings) as well as “basiceng” as a specific form. I am not convinced that “ogden” is better, nor that people will confuse “basiceng” with “simple” since Wikipedia or VOA or whomever will certainly use the latter, and “basiceng” reflects the name of the specific form in question better than “ogden” does. 

The forms for “basiceng” were submitted 29 October and it appears that there are no edits to be made. I will file the “simple” forms shortly.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email