IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ietf-languages] Region codes

David Mediavilla <nkd595qbd4@liamekaens.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <nkd595qbd4@liamekaens.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412E63A49EB for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8O6L5l20bbL for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E803A49EA for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 1F79F7C6C5F; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:54:55 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=192.0.33.74; helo=pechora4.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=nkd595qbd4@liamekaens.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora4.lax.icann.org (pechora4.icann.org [192.0.33.74]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5EAB7C6C5D for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:54:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sneak2.sneakemail.com (sneak2.sneakemail.com [64.46.159.148]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pechora4.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B73370000D3 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:54:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (sneakemail censored 10968-1618876471-468179 #2); 19 Apr 2021 23:54:31 -0000
Received: (sneakemail censored 10968-1618876471-468179 #1); 19 Apr 2021 23:54:31 -0000
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:47:16 +0000
From: David Mediavilla <nkd595qbd4@liamekaens.com>
To: "ietf-languages@iana.org" <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Message-ID: <10968-1618876471-468179@sneakemail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Perl5 Mail::Internet v
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (pechora4.lax.icann.org [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:54:53 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/tfmSkcEy0Sf1eaAPpYvUSDbHb4s>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:02:09 -0700
Subject: [Ietf-languages] Region codes
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:17:54 -0000

About the standardizing of prefixes for the subtags for variants of the Occitan language, I understand that the use of region codes does not interfere with the prefixes, does it?
Examples:
* https://oc.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_G%C3%A0rdia tells me that in Guardia Piemontese, Calabria, Italy, a local version of Vivaro-Alpine is spoken (oc-IT-vivaraup, I guess).
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig%C3%BC%C3%A9 Pigüé in Argentina was colonized by Occitans. I guess their language would be tagged as oc-AR-lengadoc.

While I don't know if these concrete examples are important, I wanted to make sure that the possibility of tagging the regions is not lost with the new prefixes.

Thanks for looking at the issue.
--
David Mediavilla

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email