Re: [ietf-mentors] Query for Vancouver

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 30 August 2013 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-mentors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-mentors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755DE11E80E0 for <ietf-mentors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 03:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZHoN-cavgrQ for <ietf-mentors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 03:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0344111E80DE for <ietf-mentors@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 03:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7UAcPWZ024403; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:38:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eduroam-pool6-0282.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-pool6-0282.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.25.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD6E3D13; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:38:24 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2wqn3jxou.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:38:24 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A9D1D6D-091E-41D4-A673-BE8A2AC6CCAD@tzi.org>
References: <521F4994.2020502@innovationslab.net> <m2wqn3jxou.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ietf-mentors <ietf-mentors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-mentors] Query for Vancouver
X-BeenThere: ietf-mentors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Open discussion between IETF Mentor volunteers <ietf-mentors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-mentors>, <mailto:ietf-mentors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-mentors>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-mentors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-mentors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-mentors>, <mailto:ietf-mentors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:38:43 -0000

The term mentor may be raising the wrong expectations.
Most mentees don't need a lot of help.
(For those that do, there is only so much you can do.)

I have done this about half a dozen times now.
I didn't keep a lab journal, but I think the occasional contact made, the occasional hint not to miss certain hard-to-find work, and the occasional discouragement of going down the wrong path was worth the effort in most cases.

(Of course, if the organizers do expect a deep relationship between mentors and mentees, I have been doing this wrong all the time.)

Grüße, Carsten