IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration request for EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version

Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Sun, 02 September 2018 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0975130E2F for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 03:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cbLR3lD87vFL for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 03:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay11.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay11.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B44130E20 for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 03:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp5.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.207]) by relay11.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1fwPxb-0006dA-aJ for ietf-message-headers@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 11:50:28 +0100
Received: from gklyne38.plus.com ([81.174.129.24] helo=sasharissa.local) by smtp5.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1fwPxa-0004os-JC for ietf-message-headers@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 11:50:27 +0100
Message-ID: <5B8BC072.9060909@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 11:50:26 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
References: <CAAwgnnOSdnKMDBZFq2BzazP6eKsPpAeuEmN6qstTCFQ8nQ=1+A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMC7itwTqKEfKn=U_aM2TKTkwN+Bzp6E1aj47gp9S66YrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAwgnnPh9dKaadxMiOzm=ZV2N_i5WrhD3unVBJ8jVSriLNq8MA@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR05MB42420B1185F9CC9508B50432840F0@BN7PR05MB4242.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMAyiJvNDprx5AhjFTW9BkHy5D0vjhgVjuJzQwSC+kyujg@mail.gmail.com> <7C3260F5-FE8D-43A7-8866-2299D60AE5C6@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <7C3260F5-FE8D-43A7-8866-2299D60AE5C6@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
X-Oxmail-Spam-Status: score=0.0 tests=none
X-Oxmail-Spam-Level: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-message-headers/PNaXQabu74VBYo_A8ouXdR9GehI>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration request for EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-message-headers/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:50:32 -0000

On 01/09/2018 00:48, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Speaking personally, I'd second that concern. It's least confusing when headers that are specific to an application (in this case, OData) include that application's name in their field name.
>

+1

#g

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email