Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Updates to registration request for EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version

Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org> Tue, 18 December 2018 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FD9130F63 for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:28:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oasis-open-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlnYF7Msy5Nv for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA55F1292F1 for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id h50so15153026ede.5 for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:28:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oasis-open-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h5xTQEegdBGl31vfy7oz4yey8H3CymIUMOPFrR0FyMU=; b=ci10V9eeK258dJyN+V/6+JGpagZ+ZDouhqyOqHUq5J3mSKjKM3dnuCjqcm7st864LV hdjkcg8eXNqiYfM7BNezJcd31s2GjjsoMp8D8fVbkrTT/8/9lt3xQ2SLVDD2X0hW95PA eRkgNOE6x77YYYD+dFsJl5Cnwfs5hyxMZeuKvmgnZqmeN+Lnci3mp5c2ltaNV+0cLZxc 4Wa8+5ypYacd9jXULPXKsbdzwWJRDAmKSBl/+1kPMDdO92O2x/46gjVxk/UjCJayrcNG TjBz5Yc3JYyhTFcvVGgYDZ3iCA08yv2YThE9zs+eaNysYATbyR1mIAwaOFWCD1W8jEPB ukjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h5xTQEegdBGl31vfy7oz4yey8H3CymIUMOPFrR0FyMU=; b=JAnql74f4mUNrZuawE3sAaXOs71N6QzgfKvQeV8XAnTJK8W+1NUUSRVCgnrnfSRLQ5 dCKuOpArQtcuV5epGnCcBuyiRQHJf1HUTx3aEfYzgdRGrM7eoQoWdE21/TFVShiPf+Z5 BvOAlcRqhddF+wQLWuDaqwjUDlRzWZV1QblfHkf9Q5clOaUh1eg/7vv7kCcaYtGAk/Mw paH9u30ANjUQDR5NBG+XTFR6Cs0ZBkSVXLXCgVSDmLvGps5/5n3cRduwBhE5JNx3Ta4O i8g6bwvlDI8QmiJVunizwFZpBaaQ+r82CdSOcdyqy0c/5Cd9rcFaY7g4zxB+jz9AG0xl zVRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYiTi/KEgLniHLlKdDcRhakf3a8up1fCV812dIwulseB7aK4XwK vr8No6Z1El+rAlIucQfndJSnYLgCc/yODJeZyXXM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WyEpUe6qsOp6BbIGdEFBVb+C26r6YrxKn8ya4iQsgPel+iECICSrAm9mAd5c//IZ+iK0nN/yqXdH5IPT225vc=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:af21:: with SMTP id g30mr7120346edd.234.1545168503227; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:28:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAwgnnPNNUWDPQvo5bUzpd7FQ+sSaZYNydCBPTfVV6QY5TZhEw@mail.gmail.com> <724DB0C1-B093-46C6-B55B-A5DDE9ECACE1@mnot.net> <d2d53db904dd409cad6d845f4b58f1e7@sap.com>
In-Reply-To: <d2d53db904dd409cad6d845f4b58f1e7@sap.com>
From: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAwgnnPH87bFX2J6_P_0qyeRN89a05HYFyqMN0hKCrODUEqs5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Handl, Ralf" <ralf.handl@sap.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-message-headers@ietf.org" <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c0e14c057d529354"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-message-headers/kx6o_etOJSrtXzOz_udVQqvdlMQ>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Updates to registration request for EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-message-headers/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:28:28 -0000

Hi Mark,

Can you advise on the best way to proceed? Should I work with the TC to
draft a revised registration request?

Thank you,

/chet

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:23 AM Handl, Ralf <ralf.handl@sap.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> We no longer want to reserve it for single token use and instead want to
> register five values: read-uncommitted, read-committed, repeatable-read,
> snapshot, and serializable.
>
> Thanks
> Ralf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> Sent: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2018 01:58
> To: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
> Cc: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org; Handl, Ralf <ralf.handl@sap.com>
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Updates to registration request for
> EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version
>
> Chet,
>
> Can you speak to why the request is still for "Isolation", instead of
> "OData-Isolation"?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 7 Dec 2018, at 5:05 am, Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > This message contains an update to the registration request submitted on
> August 29 2018 in
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00195.html
> >
> > In response to this request, on August 29, in
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00196.html,
> Ted Hardie wrote:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > I'm a little confused on one point.  The Isolation header states that it
> was called OData-Isolation in version 4.0, but the linked ABNF document
> says:
> >
> > isolation  = [ "OData-" ] "Isolation" ":" OWS "snapshot"
> >
> > That seems to indicate that both ODate-Isolation and Isolation are
> expected to be valid for this token.  The ABNF for EntityID is similar:
> >
> > entityid   = [ "OData-" ] "EntityID" ":" OWS IRI-in-header
> >
> > Can you clarify the intent here?  Are both expressions of this token
> expected to continue?
> >
> > In general, "Isolation" seems to be a very general concept, and the
> reservation of it, unadorned, for a single token use ("snapshot") is
> somewhat surprising compared to the more-obviously scoped OData-isolation.
> EntityID seems similar board in possible usage outside the OData
> specification.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > In response, the TC renamed EntityId header to OData-EntityId and added
> additional values for the Isolation header to align with most database
> systems.
> >
> >
> > On August 30, in
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00197.html,
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > "Applicable protocol" should be "http", I think.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > In response, the TC changed the Applicable protocol to http.
> >
> > Below, please find the revised request. I have included the prior values
> in [ ]s so that all the changes are visible.
> >
> > Please let us know if this addresses your comments and if you have any
> other questions or concerns.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Open Data (OData) Protocol IANA Header registration request
> > 28-Nov-2018
> >
> > This documentation contains the information needed for Permanent
> Registration of the OData specific request headers with IANA as called out
> in RFC 3864 - Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields.
> >
> > The OData headers to be registered as Permanent Headers are
> >
> > OData-EntityId  [WAS EntityID]
> > Isolation
> > OData-MaxVersion
> > OData-Version
> >
> > The details as required by RFC 3864 for these headers are listed below
> >
> >
> > ####
> > Header field name:
> >       OData-EntityId  [WAS EntityID]
> >
> > Applicable protocol:
> >       http   [WAS OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData)]
> >
> > Status:
> >       Standard
> >
> > Author/Change controller:
> >       OASIS
> >
> > Specification document(s):
> >
> > OData Version 4.01 Part 1: Protocol -
> >
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.01/odata-v4.01-part1-protocol.html#sec_HeaderEntityIdODataEntityId
>
> >
> > Related information:
> >
> >     None  [WAS The EntityId header was named OData-EntityId in OData
> version 4.0.]
> >
> >
> > ####
> > Header field name:
> >       Isolation
> >
> > Applicable protocol:
> >       http   [WAS OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData)]
> >
> > Status:
> >       Standard
> >
> > Author/Change controller:
> >       OASIS
> >
> > Specification document(s):
> >
> > OData Version 4.01 Part 1: Protocol -
> >
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.01/odata-v4.01-part1-protocol.html#sec_HeaderIsolationODataIsolation
> >
> > Related information:
> >
> > The Isolation header was named OData-Isolation in OData version 4.0.
> The OData Protocol document referenced above defines one valid value,
> snapshot.  To make this header useful to applications other than OData this
> registration also defines the values read-uncommitted, read-committed,
> repeatable-read and serializable.  These correspond to the standard
> transaction isolation levels exposed by most database systems.
> >    [WAS The Isolation header was named OData-Isolation in OData version
> 4.0.]
> >
> >
> > ####
> > Header field name:
> >       OData-MaxVersion
> >
> > Applicable protocol:
> >       http   [WAS OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData)]
> >
> > Status:
> >       Standard
> >
> > Author/Change controller:
> >       OASIS
> >
> > Specification document(s):
> > OData Version 4.01 Part 1: Protocol -
> >
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.01/odata-v4.01-part1-protocol.html#sec_HeaderODataMaxVersion
>
> >
> >
> > Related information:
> >       <none>
> >
> >
> >
> > ####
> > Header field name:
> >       OData-Version
> >
> > Applicable protocol:
> >       http   [WAS OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData)]
> >
> > Status:
> >       Standard
> >
> > Author/Change controller:
> >       OASIS
> >
> > Specification document(s):
> >       OData Version 4.01 Part 1: Protocol -
> >
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.01/odata-v4.01-part1-protocol.html#sec_HeaderODataVersion
>
> >
> >
> > Related information:
> >       <none>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > /chet
> > ----------------
> > Chet Ensign
> > Chief Technical Community Steward
> > OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> > http://www.oasis-open.org
> >
> > Primary: +1 973-996-2298
> > Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-message-headers mailing list
> > Ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>

-- 

/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Chief Technical Community Steward
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393