Re: [Ietf-message-headers] provisional registration Accept-Datetime header

[Herbert van de Sompel <[e-mail]>]

Julian, Bjoern,

Forgive me for the brevity, but I thought I was following the procedure
described in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3864.

=> For a very brief overview of the use of the proposed headers, see
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3864 , section "The Memento Solution, Part 1".

=> The templates list 2 email addresses: my personal one and the
[e-mail] group where tech discussions about the Memento
framework take place.

I hope this helps.

Greetings

Herbert


On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>wrote:

> On 20.05.2010 16:58, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
>> * Herbert Van de Sompel wrote:
>>
>>> PROVISIONAL MESSAGE HEADER FIELD SUBMISSION TEMPLATE:
>>>
>>>    Header field name: Accept-Datetime
>>>
>>>    Applicable protocol: http
>>>
>>>    Status: provisional
>>>
>>>    Author/Change controller: Herbert Van de Sompel,
>>> [e-mail], Los Alamos National Laboratory,
>>> http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/
>>> , Memento Development Group at [e-mail]
>>>
>>>    Specification document(s): http://www.mementoweb.org/guide/http/
>>>
>>
>> Per RFC 3864 section 4.2.2 the specification should indicate an email
>> address "for sending technical comments and discussion of the proposed
>> message header". Could that be added? I also note that it would be use-
>> ful if the specification had some definitional sentence ala "The Accept-
>> Datetime header is a HTTP request-header that ...".
>>
>
> +1
>
> I see slides, guides, examples, but what I couldn't find quickly was the
> actual definition. (I think it would be great to have just the core
> definitions in an IETF document....)
>
> Best regards, Julian
>



-- 
Herbert Van de Sompel
Digital Library Research & Prototyping
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Research Library
http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/