Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility - draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 22:12 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7CF2B11E80F9 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038,
BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQC3Fm-y3MCb for
<ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com
[IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C8E6F11E80D7 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.129.17]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r72MC2OT017284
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010;
t=1375481536; bh=SlKXRXyONDvdx+JmQ/gi8hcQHB1gfUHV/j4d/lUFiSU=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References;
b=43FZWSKzqq4k9ixULn6pfYssdy/XFwgpJPYHQxbqoxxbvEWV1U15Jc2jw2x9grHBT
Vw6JxLVsW18v4uqr7tZNG83pwbHXUG6xxcMaY2axvYIUx3VpD/1MTlL0WX+MRUb7+B
g8dj4dydGNUFR3rrdU185/fD3vMB/YQEN/0oRg3w=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail;
t=1375481536; i=@elandsys.com; bh=SlKXRXyONDvdx+JmQ/gi8hcQHB1gfUHV/j4d/lUFiSU=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References;
b=qtypj/zMHQOhM9hwFSZ0x3Z0puODv1dZ/BsIZHPtg5RtYVbs/OaVhtXeVK7Jj3AXr
cXKFdyuGbj8ddQxvbyCxlP2hBuySHPNoAFxnWOovpE33iHGcgO5A3fEO9tWkweJb+i
OfOtI6Vxu9A1y3fIzb2q8x9qNuvBNYsHNljuB69o=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130802144528.0d72db50@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:11:26 -0700
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <7005.1375463010@sandelman.ca>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130730022629.0b408308@elandnews.com>
<32379.1375179842@sandelman.ca>
<6.2.5.6.2.20130730034456.0d81a700@elandnews.com>
<21977.1375188403@sandelman.ca>
<6.2.5.6.2.20130730072017.0d2397d0@elandnews.com>
<12009.1375197220@sandelman.ca>
<6.2.5.6.2.20130730085204.0d6ca950@elandnews.com>
<7005.1375463010@sandelman.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility -
draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process
<ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>,
<mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-nomcom>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>,
<mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:12:24 -0000
Hi Michael,
At 10:03 02-08-2013, Michael Richardson wrote:
>I don't think that I understand your sentence.
I cannot quantify "not significantly". It is easier for me to err by
reading it as "not different".
>I mean that I don't think that your change in rule will make very many people
>eligible who were not already eligible, nor will it keep people eligible when
>there are reasons why they can not travel.
>
>In particular, I think that if we want more gendre and age equity, then we
>must be aware of this childbirth constraint on travel (on both men and women).
Ok.
Dave Crocker mentioned the word "participatory" a few weeks ago. I
would like to use it capture what you mentioned above. Adrian Farrel
mentioned the following:
"I find it interesting that the competing tensions of "make sure there
is a set of more experienced people on NomCom" and "widen NomCom to
allow broader participation" might be solved by the same measure."
I would look at the proposal from that perspective.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… S Moonesamy
- [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligi… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Michael Richardson
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Eggert, Lars
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Michael Richardson
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Michael Richardson
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Michael Richardson
- Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: E… Michael Richardson