IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 17 October 2017 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6856E13420E for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJ2UnXzGWkR1 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A65132D22 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9HFI3TT024000; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:18:10 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=p1nOPDTOKPi2n6Jfw1PXPFDg3yfSRcnOkZlMMKrZxPQ=; b=WSVUmBSai1hFi+21KXNjWlCljXzQOgHiLDsptZujhgWKRPHOOG3KuUMyJUn7wVljYVH9 XaedL8rpYshBTNpcUqPeceb3hjzZTjdz5MpDwAiXyxeXiVVmgJ8speunZtJ8Vx1t7nSk 5bUXqT/XzxCgqYX7dayRegGB58iO9RDbHTW+7Lak4Ifbh66O2UM+kRDUI3XV9dhBfTvZ ba6qYM0AZC/zEZ/7bnMQxx6goUItbnaiHELlhQWjPPu5vQPAsAgNT65k6RAFkP9TGk+U v/yhrdgjR8f7oQ+UuauZAFqLFGw1mzaNa+2DNYv7rUJ3TQcuROuRvBOkXChX+wv32nVu WA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dngpbgjj7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:18:10 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9HFH1XF028330; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:18:09 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dkdwu90hk-3 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:18:09 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:18:05 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:18:05 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:18:05 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
CC: NomComDiscussion <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"
Thread-Index: AQHTRsiE55WWCJX6hk63Iqd9YTsfKKLoSbsAgAAWIICAAABCgIAAC6KA
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:18:04 +0000
Message-ID: <FF365C9F-6CE1-41A5-82BB-F15CFB748492@akamai.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20171016135236.12dcaa60@elandnews.com> <3E158B61-DCF7-485C-B350-DA14B2B8CBDA@akamai.com> <CAA=duU0aiLUzZAP3vmS2tTzxEinzc4hA0UFpd3_dprkjDHnqkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU31pL8qpqYVfEdsPXt5UcZxKKfTDotbBi6yRmmoC2UgWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU31pL8qpqYVfEdsPXt5UcZxKKfTDotbBi6yRmmoC2UgWg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.39.87]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FF365C9F6CE141A582BBF15CFB748492akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-17_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710170215
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-17_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710170215
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/W516WCGZKz1GT7C53lIN41IPxXo>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:18:16 -0000

Thanks.

Did I miss announcement of it in any of this year’s nomcom postings?

From: Andrew Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 10:36 AM
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: NomComDiscussion <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"

Whoops, I fat-fingered. meant ietf-nomcom@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>, not nomcom@ietf.org<mailto:nomcom@ietf.org>.

Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>> wrote:
Rich,

Is that a public list, or is it for the nomcom members?  I don’t recall seeing it mentioned in any of the email about a public list, but maybe I missed it.  I was thinking of something more like the “99attendees” type of list, or the wg-chairs lists where people who are interested in the *process* or perhaps just this year’s crop of nominees could talk about it.  Is that what this list is for?

nomcom@ietf.org<mailto:nomcom@ietf.org> is a public list, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ietf-2Dnomcom&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=twjoWuG_uiG2FIAAnI-CkMNnPAXmbBMA9ZQKQUet_zg&s=Hzx_r3Orn069F9HdfnapH5-kSWJMk2Ml2pQugmpABnw&e=> for details and to join the fun.

Cheers,
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email