Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"

["Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>]

Rich,

Looking back through my email archives, I see that I joined the list on
3/25/09. It was formed as a result of the plenary discussion at the March
2009 IETF meeting (who says that nothing ever results from those
discussions?). It’s a discussion list about the nomcom process, but not a
part of the actual process itself.

Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Salz, Rich <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Did I miss announcement of it in any of this year’s nomcom postings?
>
>
>
> *From: *Andrew Malis <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 10:36 AM
> *To: *Rich Salz <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *NomComDiscussion <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"
>
>
>
> Whoops, I fat-fingered. meant [e-mail], not [e-mail].
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Andrew G. Malis <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
>
>
> Is that a public list, or is it for the nomcom members?  I don’t recall
> seeing it mentioned in any of the email about a public list, but maybe I
> missed it.  I was thinking of something more like the “99attendees” type of
> list, or the wg-chairs lists where people who are interested in the
> *process* or perhaps just this year’s crop of nominees could talk about
> it.  Is that what this list is for?
>
>
>
> [e-mail] is a public list, see https://www.ietf.org/
> mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ietf-2Dnomcom&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=twjoWuG_uiG2FIAAnI-CkMNnPAXmbBMA9ZQKQUet_zg&s=Hzx_r3Orn069F9HdfnapH5-kSWJMk2Ml2pQugmpABnw&e=>
> for details and to join the fun.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>