Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD0A126BF3 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WmrlH_gPotYX for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C2DC13217D for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9KKWPi2004593; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:32:25 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=wB1a86uQDS3PTUZgj5+tZ8dNNDO+bXCay9ZKCn7fVI8=; b=D0GgVbb3UqQtCI1hYIB7RFr9kjgl7zFRjeNQD3rHX2BizfrHd+Q3L0rhPF5TBNp1cj7t vuErlU54p3IXkykV9YYXaPsi3B4SE+Cf1eMOzzmh6e9Uw33Mb52cn6nf0Pj0UG5IIztM At94DnoZ2ZhFnMWcJusOcoZRFwfbsEMWvL2lz99GmiFLXelV/o6qMEWH4xWg33RTtBr7 Xoyf3HF26rTfGCYe5hrzc72vNjhdQdL5FD8v4wIaWumVb2R5bR+ynSMAXd5AyeZikttf nazL1H8oaTAwYgM6jnsDaXS2FD9ymmm32CxQH3jyZkSDuCGUJwXValeI6V9RyonsqC37 5w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dpa0d0c2a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:32:24 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9KKV5dO023840; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:32:22 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dkdwukreb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:32:22 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:32:22 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:32:22 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
CC: NomComDiscussion <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"
Thread-Index: AQHTRsiE55WWCJX6hk63Iqd9YTsfKKLoSbsAgAAWIICAAABCgIAAC6KAgAAEb4CABOL1AIAAJ2gA
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:32:21 +0000
Message-ID: <85A0B48D-14B0-4939-B3E5-AB66BF6A0831@akamai.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20171016135236.12dcaa60@elandnews.com> <3E158B61-DCF7-485C-B350-DA14B2B8CBDA@akamai.com> <CAA=duU0aiLUzZAP3vmS2tTzxEinzc4hA0UFpd3_dprkjDHnqkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU31pL8qpqYVfEdsPXt5UcZxKKfTDotbBi6yRmmoC2UgWg@mail.gmail.com> <FF365C9F-6CE1-41A5-82BB-F15CFB748492@akamai.com> <CAA=duU2k+8-+M2vj5Tk_czJA_VL0ZJ8Z8xhpo0zqu-JqY7mWNQ@mail.gmail.com> <46F8E6BB-E370-45C8-8D1B-C29D12A9E498@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <46F8E6BB-E370-45C8-8D1B-C29D12A9E498@elistx.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.45.186]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9111CA7EFC40614FBD860E30B637EF6E@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-20_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710200286
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-20_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710200287
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/h0TC6-JAwtGrX12gwMxjLwnOIQs>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Experiment in "full transparency"
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:32:30 -0000

>    All of these archives exist and can be found in the IETF list archive 
    area.
    

That’s great.  Should we be trying to encourage more participation in the current process, and if so what’s the best way to do so?