IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] BCP 10 Update, adding an IAOC Advisor to the Nominating Committee

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 25 August 2017 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0B71329D5 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y36hzNWEE-Rp for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB45132377 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1dl31S-000FVS-HO; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:02:54 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:02:48 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: NomCom-Discussion <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <51834349A25B99F85321F96C@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <ed849d7d-6831-86f7-4b98-f9a5702ad657@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CAKKJt-cd2-tS=3QnvRcsDKcZ8=o5Z98wUr-=tp8OeP9J1M0M8g@mail.gmail.com> <4622.1502292425@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAKKJt-fxhFnnK3T2nVj2bD=Ve7z6L0oJFjYFqBb59TusJDwFzQ@mail.gmail.com> <1250df52-b5b3-4f71-bab1-790d156af1e9@nostrum.com> <5f26388a-93aa-7133-6973-de669a9bb2f4@gmail.com> <CAA=duU2hn-6=OzvZrfuz0agvzxvV0euXP4nsnjdksUpsnAyfJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-chkcrJRfCU1_MHb47H7GZNHafkbwVZKNsxh2pQzXyiYA@mail.gmail.c om> <6e62d88a-ba0e-18eb-3a45-88851b6e7c46@joelhalpern.com> <CAKKJt-dJ2Z1wsqXveg7+PR13d2bH61pHR753gEamwqWv4f+hKQ@mail.gmail.com> <0c83a20d-325b-d928-a157-638fcaf81adf@cs.tcd.ie> <CAKKJt-dsUt-bwtFiDY3Lek52QnmJT6z4O9+Bv3Py1He1vMW3-A@mail.gmail.com> <2e2ecf8a-e843-795b-f96b-b183e2b3a84c@cs.tcd.ie> <CAKKJt-crXRBdu2+vVzuptk-rknTFsHCg=xhPM6YqsD-e=7_7dw@mail.gmail.com> <ed849d7d-6831-86f7-4b98-f9a5702ad657@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/icivFEgRvhXmJdiOszJ5iHjiYfs>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] BCP 10 Update, adding an IAOC Advisor to the Nominating Committee
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 01:03:00 -0000


--On Friday, August 25, 2017 01:31 +0100 Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

>...
> John's suggestion to say that helpers are needed for all the
> major bodies to which nomcoms appoint members seems like it
> should be fine when well wordsmithed.

Just for the record, my suggestion wasn't "are needed" but that
the Nomcom should consider each one and decide what, if
anything, was needed and how any advisors/helpers who are needed
should interact with the Nomcom.  Put differently, I'm in favor
of reminding Nomcoms about cases they should consider (thereby
covering the "no one thought of it" cases) but much less in
favor of telling them what they should conclude or what they
should do about it.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email