Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility - draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lars,

[Cc note to list moderator, there are a few messages in the queue. :-) ]

At 04:11 30-07-2013, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>For (c), I'd prefer if you said "served as a WG chair or a 
>NomCom-appointed position", instead of tying the eligibility to the 
>format of the announcement emails.

I got some other feedback along the same lines.  I'll merge them and 
propose some text.

>But more generally, my guess would be that the number of people that 
>do not satisfy (a) but satisfy (b) or (c) is very small. (I don't 
>have data, but the secretariat might.) So I think the change you 
>propose would by and large be a no-op, and I therefore question the 
>need for it.

I don't have the numbers.  I'll encourage people to comment about 
whether it makes a difference to them.

>PS: You should revise your abstract and introduction. The document 
>no longer allows "all contributors to the IETF Standards Process to 
>be eligible to serve on NomCom and sign a Recall petition."  At 
>best, it allows a few more contributors to do so.

Agreed.  I'll need to rework them in light of the new proposal.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy