IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility - draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 05 August 2013 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BA221F9F5F for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pSyiU0UZ+Eo for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228ED21F9ED4 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68862018B; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:24:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 04EE063A88; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:16:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B8563732; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:16:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130802144528.0d72db50@elandnews.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130730022629.0b408308@elandnews.com> <32379.1375179842@sandelman.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20130730034456.0d81a700@elandnews.com> <21977.1375188403@sandelman.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20130730072017.0d2397d0@elandnews.com> <12009.1375197220@sandelman.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20130730085204.0d6ca950@elandnews.com> <7005.1375463010@sandelman.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20130802144528.0d72db50@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:16:21 -0400
Message-ID: <2413.1375719381@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:01:15 -0700
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility - draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-nomcom>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:18:02 -0000

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
    > Hi Michael,
    > At 10:03 02-08-2013, Michael Richardson wrote:
    >> I don't think that I understand your sentence.

    > I cannot quantify "not significantly".  It is easier for me to err by reading
    > it as "not different".

Yes, I agree.  I am saying that I do not think the eligible set will be
different.  Your proposal solves no problems, but causes no harm in my
opinion.

    > Dave Crocker mentioned the word "participatory" a few weeks ago.  I would
    > like to use it capture what you mentioned above.  Adrian Farrel mentioned the
    > following:

    > "I find it interesting that the competing tensions of "make sure there
    > is a set of more experienced people on NomCom" and "widen NomCom to
    > allow broader participation" might be solved by the same measure."

I think that it would be great.
I don't know what measure would do this, though.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email