[ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility - draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F355311E8144 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9h8D19bUm6l for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB89B21E804B for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.144.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6U9t8pE004278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1375178130; bh=zbKcPYSwPXckL1aEI9KiJQUd721J2LMt862fgZO2ehE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=T3sBHLGBOQwDqtvcL2M9SUDO+fkG+FJcl6LKtmOCNewjuSee1CVMCL6hVnu/pLYPs MLm/qLabKoJVDHtQaG7BNHHmTbea+RCmEBzzJi3shlvxzvHD1+CaiHL8g22Gk0FtcC quA8D5NA06fRegcoNt1lcSE3x32kbvMzEKSmyQio=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1375178130; i=@elandsys.com; bh=zbKcPYSwPXckL1aEI9KiJQUd721J2LMt862fgZO2ehE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=sCqNuHVPSSwp/oj/5n3wK151ImS41MIoQxbagyqoKWVNdiyY1EcfcEKa72ZdX7IJz FZOllJWstzdRtnP7SSi1az7ygbsxnVcftc4I1E8OcOrHbZJyobV978FuW1LPewz26j UBOR0BnfHWtd+Fckb6D1Qg79NnuHyRYuGA/VMM7M=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130730022629.0b408308@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:47:07 -0700
To: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:48:00 -0700
Cc: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
Subject: [ietf-nomcom] Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility - draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-nomcom>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:57:05 -0000

Hello,

I submitted a revision of the draft about updating the "Nominating 
Committee Process: Eligibility" ( 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01 ).

Stephen Farrell , Olafur Gudmundsson and John Curran mentioned that 
physically attending one meeting is not enough.  Eliot Lear agreed 
and mentioned mitigating the 
risk.  draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-01 uses a two out of five 
meetings minimum eligibility rule.

There were questions about the definition of "remote attendance".  I 
removed it as it may be difficult to find an appropriate definition.

The proposed requirements are:

   (a) attended at least 3 of last 5 IETF meetings

   (b) attended at least 15 IETF meetings, including at least
       2 of the last 5 IETF meetings.

   (c) attended at least 2 of the last 5 IETF meetings and has been
       listed as least twice as personnel during the last 5 IETF
       meetings.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy