Re: [ietf-outcomes] A question of style

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 06 February 2010 23:01 UTC

Message-ID: <4B6DF4F0.7050607@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:02:08 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org>
References: <DE01B0C2-2C15-4D48-A8ED-9F7A9EF593EF@beckman.org>
In-Reply-To: <DE01B0C2-2C15-4D48-A8ED-9F7A9EF593EF@beckman.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ietf-outcomes@ietf.org" <ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-outcomes] A question of style
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net

On 2/6/2010 2:44 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> I posted the "Only SSH-2 adopted by IETF" comment to users that the
> IETF-adopted standard for SSH isnt' backward-compatible with SSH-1. No
> marketing was intended. I'll use phrasing suggested by dhc, which is
> more clear: "SSH2 is incompatible with pre-standardized SSH1".

Mel,

Thanks for the effort on the wiki and thanks for following up with me.

I apologize for removing the text before asking.  I reacted too quickly.  It's 
easy to add it back, but I wanted to wait for some feedback from the list in 
response to my query about it.  Your clarification certainly sounds reasonable.

I, for one, like your alternate wording.

Thanks!

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

Re: [ietf-outcomes] A question of style Mel Beckman
[ietf-outcomes] A question of style Dave CROCKER
Re: [ietf-outcomes] A question of style Dave CROCKER