Re: [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ?

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 12 February 2010 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE293A6818 for <ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:12:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wra69a5AT3En for <ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412DB3A6D98 for <ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.43] (adsl-68-122-34-69.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.34.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1CGDTIE028854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:13:37 -0800
Message-ID: <4B757E23.4060006@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:13:23 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4B74702B.90501@dcrocker.net> <4B7470D0.4080702@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4B7470D0.4080702@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/10387/Thu Feb 11 21:28:58 2010 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ietf-outcomes@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ?
X-BeenThere: ietf-outcomes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF Outcomes Wiki discussion list <ietf-outcomes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-outcomes>, <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-outcomes>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-outcomes>, <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:12:21 -0000

On 2/11/2010 1:04 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I was quite tempted to do +>  for XMPP (there are hundreds of extensions
> beyond the core use cases), but I figured I'd let someone else try it
> first. However, given that Facebook just enabled XMPP support (add 400m
> users to existing guesstimates), perhaps ++ is in order. :)


Two independent assessments that +> is useful is a strong indication that it's a 
good idea.

So, I'll go ahead and change the Legend according to the details I suggested in 
my previous note.

Reminder: This is all easily reversed, if folks object.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net