[ietf-outcomes] Adoption legend summary on each page?

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 13 February 2010 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76C63A7708 for <ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:16:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gh9Bm6qsk30j for <ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14803A719C for <ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.43] (adsl-68-122-34-69.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.34.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1DHHpRO029896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:17:56 -0800
Message-ID: <4B76DEB8.5040001@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:17:44 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-outcomes@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/10389/Fri Feb 12 17:11:17 2010 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [ietf-outcomes] Adoption legend summary on each page?
X-BeenThere: ietf-outcomes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF Outcomes Wiki discussion list <ietf-outcomes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-outcomes>, <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-outcomes>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-outcomes>, <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:16:34 -0000

Folks,

g'day

Ray Pelletier commented to me that the notation for the Adoption column is not 
necessarily intuitive, and that it might be helpful to replicate the coding 
rules on each page.

It might be helpful to repeat the gist of the coding description on each page.

I've put in a version of this onto the Application page, associated with the 
Legend pointer:

    <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/misc/outcomes/wiki/IetfApplications>

and would like some feedback, before installing it on the other pages, or 
removing it.

Are you comfortable with the form of summary I put on the page?

Thanks.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net