Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 22 May 2014 04:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1DA1A00BA for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 21:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FlzeLdvNjeZ9 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 21:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BAA1A00B0 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 21:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.153.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4M4ZVUw011736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 May 2014 21:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1400733343; bh=dozXjxn/Fpmvf2+OoaG1H0cPROc9XW6KG1VqVIPECv0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=118f7AA2eeSfvaEHAaAVh+5OLh6DziLWaSZuh57NPE7J1wQt38b8GHGMK48PiVodu ARfKZHR82diRSjYjk/8gJzVLwTBPVIrC/vF3abvgBoGXQSLCpS5NBEP2Mt2JwdEIgl dQWqR1Y/0cm2/crmZxim6ISkhCl/oKylwNa/DWi4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1400733343; i=@elandsys.com; bh=dozXjxn/Fpmvf2+OoaG1H0cPROc9XW6KG1VqVIPECv0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=RoumcYopfSO/jv+RS2Lz3JyHLMiRgKFYCkLtANQr7Vg8CT4O/UaL0lM/Gq/fd6BYG 7TVFOU96A1jr1jyx2vs0X/MTc7/1d06cHL81c+xUnXx/b4aPhw+gIlL4qh4as+7NyA PUJOYl/4x4yU2d11M3AQpswLMBurYj/lbtNRGsC4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140521213233.0c503e30@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:33:33 -0700
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <02e501cf7573$c123ee40$436bcac0$@huitema.net>
References: <02e501cf7573$c123ee40$436bcac0$@huitema.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/-0kWwKh0mEXAmwxnv23y0QBu_YI
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 04:36:00 -0000

Hi Christian,
At 21:10 21-05-2014, Christian Huitema wrote:
>This was then. By now, IP options are very rarely used. The RFC 
>should probably be reclassified as historic.

RFC 1108 is already classified as Historic.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy