IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 16 April 2015 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB581B2A30 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ufedl0SIjqWE for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6DFE1B3799 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.141] (104-60-96-29.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.60.96.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3GM7RTQ023792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:30 -0700
Message-ID: <5530329E.4060608@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:26 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, fredyeboah@gmail.com
References: <552FCC84.6040305@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCYuEGRidB1D=SGA0qxk+SuX6+HyqToYDmqQVmpBskWrw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCYuEGRidB1D=SGA0qxk+SuX6+HyqToYDmqQVmpBskWrw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/ERmLaWmTgaX-GAHifowQvJA0n-A>
Cc: "ietf-privacy@ietf.org" <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:07:39 -0000

On 4/16/2015 12:05 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> 
> RFC 6973 (found, among other places at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6973.txt) has an extensive terminology
> section and review of the issues.  You may find it a useful place to start.


Except that it does not define privacy.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email