Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 20 May 2014 17:26 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936BB1A0762 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YuHyhGncF1oW for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963571A0753 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.130.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4KHPwvG025885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 May 2014 10:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1400606770; bh=Ig013sI3OfkG4DNOGvcpqG2lriYR6QkXM2WgDt+IKjE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=JZGgEyJUQ5R9+vQRcArT/YrVCM3Bs5XieCyeSUePuz/qqJB1BvOhVpjcutjUhvKjE hdB4wlnFIEoTN6E7XhEvuk5LKFLN8eyiubWydOOlTIY3/c5SWt8/DMZfISVISuaQq6 ykep4nU+RyMbUKuZdWtFExxpRpordlxB46KqzhY0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1400606770; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Ig013sI3OfkG4DNOGvcpqG2lriYR6QkXM2WgDt+IKjE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=JtA2VyAR0O1AH5bzExhjWs9+2/JHYwwgSDoq3+wSyukjitnQmpt6uaWUhz9v1DiZb HLKA86+2FnRPuq3pbUuxGHnQC4bXBiHT1B0RF+KAhioLdrIRsOqRf8fbm7YViX+VJs cW1xvU24PdzhDUKj+r+Suz3E16cXHV4KK6qQFrAM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140520101715.0bda85c8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:25:35 -0700
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, ietf-privacy@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <537B5CD5.4080308@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <537B217B.8070605@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20140520044735.0b1285a0@resistor.net> <537B5CD5.4080308@cs.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/H_zT7vnxUXBYLaEm5XYF686Vrwo
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:26:15 -0000
Hi Stephen, At 06:47 20-05-2014, Stephen Farrell wrote: >Thanks SM good points (better than mine). I would look at it as everyone puts in a little something and the work gets done. As such your points are as good as mine. :-) There would be some progress if anyone interested in perversive monitoring posts a review. Regards, S. Moonesamy
- [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068 S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068 S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068 Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 5068 Scott Brim