Re: [ietf-privacy] old RFC reviews - please try this...

[Scott Brim <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Since the first year I remember there being things called "years" was
> 1982, I'm thinking that a review of this might not be that useful, no?
>
> So, is there a quick rubric for RFCs to review that might be
> particularly useful? E.g., should we focus on more recent ones?

:-)

Not necessarily recent, but essential, like TCP and DNS. We started
out with people choosing areas important to them and exploring them. I
think that's a good way to continue. However, the random pick is great
if you want to get out of your usual rut. I plan on using it some. I
like discovering unexplored regions of the IETF's oeuvre. If the
random pick gives you an RFC you don't think is worth reviewing, just
spin again -- it's free!

Scott